Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Who shares? Participation in the sharing economy in the U.S

Dados Bibliográficos

ID7324694
AutoresSuzanne M Leland (University of North Carolina at Charlotte), Suzanne Leland (0000-0002-6387-232X, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, autor correspondente), Robert Pinka (0000-0003-2884-1808, University of North Carolina at Charlotte), Robert Boyers (0000-0002-9639-1215, Research Institutes of Sweden)
Ano2023
Volume47
Fascículo4
Páginas1437-1462
Data de publicação2023-07-21
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Urban Affairs (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0735-2166 • E-ISSN: 1467-9906
EditoraTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07352166.2023.2221438
OpenAlexW4385066536
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas61

An increasing number of goods and services are now available through peer-to-peer networks, product service systems, and redistribution markets—collectively labeled the “sharing economy.” This has implications for government in the areas of regulation and the built environment. This research explores who participates in the sharing economy based on factors such as race, density, demographics and political attitudes in the U.S. Respondents who live in urban ZIP codes are more likely to have used car sharing, bicycle sharing, couch surfing, and household goods applications. However, black individuals living in more dense areas are less likely to use some of these service categories, which may be in part to discrimination or access. Age, extraversion, and presence of children in the household are also positively associated with most applications, income, and ideology appear to be largely unrelated suggesting policy beliefs are likely not a driving factor in survey respondents’ preferences. Environmental concerns only influence who participates in carsharing

Business · Demographic economics · Demographics · Economics · Government (linguistics · Ideology · Peer effects · Political science · Politics · Product (mathematics · Public economics · Race (biology · Redistribution (election · Service (business · Sharing economy · Sociology · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Psychology · Sharing Economy and Platforms · Social Psychology · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Marketing

  • Mobility as a Service

    Open Access•Peraphan Jittrapirom, Valeria Caiati et al.•Urban Planning•2017

  • The sharing economy

    Open Access•Juho Hamari, Mimmi Sjöklint et al.•Journal of the Association for…•2016

  • Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review

    Open Access•Arnold Tukker•Journal of Cleaner Production•2015

  • You are what you can access

    Russell Belk, Russell William Belk•Journal of Business Research•2014

  • Impact of Carsharing on Household Vehicle Holdings

    Open Access•Elliot Martin, Susan Shaheen et al.•Transportation Research Record…•2010

  • Sharing economy

    Open Access•Mingming Cheng•International Journal of…•2016

  • Achieving Sustainability

    Open Access•William E Rees•Journal of Planning Literature•1995

  • The Oxford Handbook of Consumption

    Frederick F Wherry, Ian Woodward•Oxford Handbook of Consumption•2018

  • Sharing Economy

    Harald Heinrichs•GAIA - Ecological Perspectives…•2013

  • Buy local, pollute less

    Open Access•Douadia Bougherara, Gilles Grolleau et al.•Ecological Economics•2009

  • Harnessing the power of mobile technology to bridge the digital divide

    Sean Mossey, Daniel Bromberg et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2018

  • The exaggerated death of geography

    Kevin Morgan•Journal of Economic Geography•2003

  • Consumption value factors as determinants of use intention and behavior of car-sharing services in the Republic of Korea

    Hyungjoon Kim, Ihsan Ullah Jan•Innovation The European Journal…•2021

  • The sharing economy

    Open Access•C MARTIN, Chris J Martin•Ecological Economics•2015

  • The Digital Divide Among Twitter Users and Its Implications for Social Research

    Open Access•Grant Blank•Social Science Computer Review•2016

  • The digital divide

    Open Access•L J Philip, Caitlin Cottrill et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2017

  • Community Technology Centers

    Lisa J Servon, Marla Nelson et al.•Journal of Urban Affairs•2001

  • Minority-White income inequality across metropolitan areas

    J Galaskiewicz, K F Anderson et al.•Journal of Urban Affairs•2019

  • Sharing, togetherness and intentional degrowth

    Open Access•Helen Jarvis•Progress in Human Geography•2017

  • Progress in Human Geography

    Open Access•N Castree•Progress in Human Geography•2018

  • Ridesourcing, the sharing economy, and the future of cities

    Open Access•Scarlett T Jin, Hui Kong et al.•Cities•2018

  • Performing the sharing economy

    Open Access•L Richardson•Geoforum•2015

  • Proximity and Innovation

    Ron Boschma•Regional Studies•2005

  • The Rural-Urban Interface

    Open Access•D T Lichter, James P Ziliak•The Annals of the American…•2017

  • Are Cities Dying

    Open Access•Edward L Glaeser•The Journal of Economic…•1998

  • Platform capitalism

    Open Access•Paul Langley, Andrew Leyshon•Finance and Society•2017

  • Where Platform Capitalism and Racial Capitalism Meet

    Open Access•Tressie Mcmillan Cottom•Sociology of Race and Ethnicity•2020

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae