Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Northern Democrats and Party Polarization in the U.S. House

Dados Bibliográficos

ID7329616
AutoresMark D Brewer (0000-0001-6794-8507, Colby College), Mack Mariani (0000-0003-1996-3694, Syracuse University), Mack D Mariani, Jeffrey M Stonecash (0000-0002-8196-4500, Syracuse University)
Ano2002
Volume27
Fascículo3
Páginas423-444
Data de publicação2002-08-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3162/036298002x200666
OpenAlexW4233414841
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas16
Referências citadas23

Over the last 25 years, there has been a steady increase in party voting in the U.S. House, with much of this increase attributed to changes in the South. We argue that changes in the North are also important. Democrats now win a higher percentage of elections in the North, and a larger percentage of the congressional party comes from the North. Northern Democrats became steadily more liberal in the 1980s and 1990s, which increased the liberal record of the entire party. We examine two factors in the rise in liberal voting in the North. First, Democrats now win more seats in urban, lower‐income, nonwhite districts that tend to generate liberal voting records. Second, there has been an increase in the number of districts that tend to produce liberal‐voting Democrats. Together, these changes have resulted in more liberal Democratic Party voting and greater polarization between the parties

Democracy · Economics · House of Representatives · Liberal Party · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Split-ticket voting · Straight-ticket voting · Voting · Chemistry · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • New Support for the Big Sort Hypothesis

    Open Access•Jesse Sussell•PS Political Science & Politics•2013

  • The wellsprings of candidate emergence

    Open Access•James G Gimpel, Frances E Lee et al.•Political Geography•2011

  • Party Polarization in Congress

    Open Access•Sean M Theriault•Party Polarization in Congress•2008

  • Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000

    Open Access•Jason M Roberts, Stephanie S Smith et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Paygo for punctuality

    Open Access•Loretta Fowler, Luke Fowler•Journal of Public Budgeting…•2016

  • Presidents and Polarization of the American Electorate

    Open Access•B Dan Wood, Soren Jordan•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2018

  • Welfare, egalitarianism, and polarization

    Open Access•Eric Paul Svensen•Journal of Public Policy•2024

  • Dividers, Not Uniters

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • One-Party States and Legislator Extremism in the US House, 1876–2012

    Neil A O’brian•The Journal of Politics•2019

  • The Macro Sort of the State Electorates

    Open Access•Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2014

  • The Rise of Partisanship and the Expansion of Partisan Conflict within the American Electorate

    Mark D Brewer•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Party Polarization in the US Congress

    Open Access•Sean M Theriault•Party Politics•2006

  • Agreeing to Disagree

    Open Access•Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House

    David W Rohde•Parties and leaders in the…•1991

  • Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996

    Open Access•John Gerring•Party Ideologies in America,…•1998

  • Party Loyalty Among Congressmen

    David R Mayhew•Party Loyalty among Congressmen•1966

  • Class and Party in American Politics

    Jeffrey M Stonecash, Jeffrey Stonecash•Class and Party in American…•2018

  • The Congressional Politics of Immigration Reform

    Susan F Martins, Susan Forbes Martin et al.•International Migration Review•2000

  • Congressmen and Their Constituencies

    Charles G Bell, Lewis A Froman•The Western Political Quarterly•1964

  • Dynamics of the Party System

    Open Access•Bernard Hennessy•The Western Political Quarterly•1974

  • Party and Constituency

    Norman Jacobson, Julius Turner•The Western Political Quarterly•1952

  • Pressures on Congress

    Clinton Rossiter, Fred W Riggs•The Western Political Quarterly•1951

  • Congressional Realignment, 1925-1978

    Ronald L Feinman, Barbara Sinclair•Journal of American History•1983

  • The Decline and Fall of the Liberal Republicans

    T Dietz, Nicol C Rae•Journal of American History•1990

  • Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers

    Open Access•Tim Groseclose, Steven D Levitt et al.•American Political Science Review•1999

  • Explaining the Change in Roll-Call Voting Behavior of Southern Democrats

    Richard Fleisher•The Journal of Politics•1993

  • The Ideological Development of the Parties in Washington, 1947-1994

    Andrew J Taylor•Polity•1996

  • Does Incrementalism Stem from Political Consensus or from Institutional Gridlock

    Bryan D Jones, James L True et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Ideological Consensus Within Divided Party Government

    Open Access•Paul Frymer•Political Science Quarterly•1994

Obras citantes distintas13
Citações por ano0,7
Intervalo de citações2003 - 2024 (22)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 14
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae