The Impact of Permissive Judicial Policies
The U.S. Supreme Court and the Right to Die
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 7352268 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Henry R Glick (Florida State University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1994 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 207-222 |
| Data de publicação | 1994-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Political Research Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/106591299404700111 |
| OpenAlex | W1968636300 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 15 |
Little research has examined the effects of permissive Supreme Court decisions that give lower courts, legislatures, and others very wide discretion in implementation. This research presents two main hypotheses that link the content of state policy before and after a permissive Supreme Court decision: (1) institutions whose previous policies exceed the scope of a new permissive Supreme Court decision will ignore the new policy and maintain their original course; (2) institutions whose previous policies lag a permissive Supreme Court ruling will innovate by altering their policies to meet but not exceed the new Supreme Court decision. A sub-hypothesis applicable to both of these hypotheses is: state political institutions that previously had no applicable policies, but adopt them following a permissive Supreme Court decision, will follow the main policy innovations chosen by their counterpart state institutions. Focusing on the right to die and the Supreme Court's Cruzan decision, the reserach confirms the hypotheses. The findings suggest that permissive Supreme Court policies have effects similar to other more directive decisions but also that permissive policies reinforce dominant patterns of state policy innovation
Certiorari · Discretion · Economics · Law and economics · Legislature · Majority opinion · Original jurisdiction · Permissive · Political science · Supreme court · Supreme Court Decisions · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Policy Transfer and Learning
Judicial policies
The diffusion of innovations
State Supreme Courts
Judicial Decisions and Organization Change
Innovation and Reinvention in State Policymaking
Policy Innovativeness as a Trait of American States
The Meaning of Federalism in The Federalist
Implementing a Permissive Policy
The Role of State Supreme Courts in Judicial Policy Making
Innovation in the States
Patterns of Adoption of Tort Law Innovations
Judicial Innovation and Policy Re-Invention
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,16 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2007 - 2018 (12) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |