Divergent Constitution of Liberal Regimes

Comparison of the U.S. and German Automotive Supplier Markets

Dados Bibliográficos

ID7353910
AutoresHyeong-Ki Kwon (autor correspondente)
Ano2003
Volume31
Fascículo1
Páginas93-130
Data de publicação2003-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPolitics & Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0032-3292 • E-ISSN: 1552-7514
EditoraSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0032329202250163
OpenAlexW2141131767
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas6

This article investigates, based on in-depth interviews and mail surveys, the different ways liberal market regimes are constituted by looking at two small market societies, the U.S. and German automotive parts markets. In a situation in which neoliberal paradigm is being challenged and prior norms about contracts and contractual relations do not work either, this article explores how different conceptions of fairness and divergent market regimes are constituted. This article claims that divergent market regimes result from different kinds of problem-solving practices in a novel context among reflexive agents—public deliberation versus isolated dyadic deliberation of conflicts

Automotive industry · Constitution · Context (archaeology · Deliberation · Economics · German · Political economy · Political science · Positive economics · Reflexivity · Social science · Sociology · Work (physics · Economic and Social Issues · Engineering · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Law