Towards an Integrated Model of the U.S. Supreme Court's Federalism Decision Making
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 7364374 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Perry Mcd Collins (0000-0002-5474-4123, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2007 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 505-531 |
| Data de publicação | 2007-01-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Publius The Journal of Federalism (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0048-5950 • E-ISSN: 1747-7107 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/publius/pjm019 |
| OpenAlex | W2159476615 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 16 |
Disputes involving the boundaries of state versus federal power make up a substantial portion of the U.S. Supreme Court's docket and have undergone extensive analysis. Yet, the conventional wisdom regarding the justices’ choices in these cases is that they are highly inconsistent. I argue that this is primarily a function of the failure of scholars to develop a comprehensive model of the justices’ federalism decision making. To remedy this, I introduce an integrated model of the individual justices’ choices in these cases, which is then subjected to empirical testing in the Rehnquist Court era (1986–2004). I explore a host of determinants of the justices’ decision making, including attitudinal, institutional, legal, and personal attributes, as well as the role of organized interests in the Court. The findings reveal that the choices justices make in these cases are not as discordant as most commentators suggest. Rather, they are relatively predictable through the application of an integrated model of judicial choice
Federalism · New Federalism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Supreme court · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Law
Judicial Behavior and the Rehnquist Court's Federalism Revolution
State Coalitions, Informational Signals, and Success as Amicus Curiae at the U.S. Supreme Court
The judicial politics of federal relations
National Policy Preferences and Judicial Review of State Statutes at the United States Supreme Court
State Coordinating Institutions and Agenda Setting on the U.S. Supreme Court
Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Alito, and New Federalism Jurisprudence
How Courts Decide Federalism Disputes
Amicus Coalition Heterogeneity and Signaling Credibility in Supreme Court Agenda Setting
Is Federalism Dead or Alive in the Supreme Court? Implications for Public Administrators
Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices
Friends of the Court
Federalism Outcomes and Ideological Preferences
Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999
U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making, Case Salience, and the Attitudinal Model
The Untroubled World of Jurimetrics
Supreme Court Decision Making
Interest Group Success in the Courts
Understanding Interaction Models
The Rehnquist Court and the Political Dynamics of Federalism
Measuring Issue Salience
The Institutional Sources of State Success in Federalism Litigation before the Supreme Court
Jurisprudential Regimes and Supreme Court Decisionmaking
Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,42 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2007 - 2026 (20) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 7 |