What influences universities’ regional engagement? A multi-stakeholder perspective applying a Q-methodological approach
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 7366559 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Verena Radinger-Peer (0000-0001-6030-3300, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 170-185 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Regional Studies Regional Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2168-1376 • E-ISSN: 2168-1376 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/21681376.2019.1578258 |
| PMID | 31565586 |
| OpenAlex | W2944436035 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 7 |
| Referências citadas | 24 |
This paper argues that rather than being a process that can be objectively planned or predicted, regional engagement on the part of universities is a learning activity featuring characteristics of a subjective deliberation process. This subjective deliberation process is simultaneously influenced by factors operating at the intra-organizational and regional level, as well as the field in which the university is located. A model that takes this multilevel environment into account is applied to a single case study region: Kaiserslautern (Germany). A Q-methodological approach is employed to reveal and analyze the aforementioned subjective perspectives regarding drivers of universities' regional engagement. Two key viewpoints emerge from this analysis: one perspective reflects a highly institutionalized reading of regional engagement, and can be traced to the strong policy push to create universities as drivers of regional development in the Palatinate. The second perspective recognizes greater diversity among the various engagement activities pursued by universities beyond this narrow institutional engagement, driven through individual interaction with regional partners. These insights question the widespread pipeline-dominated perspective on universities' regional engagement and argue for a more systemic understanding of the role of higher education institutions within their region
Citizen journalism · Deliberation · Diversity (politics · Higher education · Knowledge management · Pedagogy · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Public relations · Regional science · Sociology · Stakeholder · Stakeholder engagement · Student engagement · Viewpoints · Computer Science · Delphi Technique in Research · Higher Education Governance and Development · Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Understanding Cancel Culture in Higher Education in the Arab World
Structural and agentic powers in university-based regional innovation across Chinese core and non-core cities
Higher education institutions and innovative entrepreneurship
Developing non-core regions by establishing new universities
Contextualizing the role of universities to regional development
Postneoliberalism and institutions of higher education involvement in regional economic development
The role of anchor institutions in creating value for SMEs
Doing Q Methodological Research
Links and Impacts
Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions
Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations
Academic engagement and commercialisation
University–industry linkages in the UK
The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields
The Environmental Behaviour of Farmers – Capturing the Diversity of Perspectives with a Q Methodological Approach
Doing Q ethodology
Tiers of Engagement by Universities in their Region's Development
Strategic agency and institutional change
Understanding the Regional Contribution of Higher Education Institutions
The Iron Cage Revisited
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2019 - 2025 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 7 |