Navigating the Phonology-Syntax Interface and Tri-P Mapping
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 7438147 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Theresa L Miller (0000-0002-1227-1399, State University of New York at Oswego, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-05-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Proceedings of the Annual Meetings on Phonology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2377-3324 • E-ISSN: 2377-3324 |
| Editora | Linguistic Society of America (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.3765/amp.v8i0.4718 |
| OpenAlex | W3020909594 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
| Referências citadas | 20 |
While it is widely acknowledged that phonological processes may be restricted to certain domains, appearing in a particular location or spanning some - but not all - junctures within (morpho-)syntactic structure, debate centers on how to derive phonological domains. There are three main models in the current literature: Relational Mapping, Syntax-Driven Mapping, and Syntactic-Spell Out. Comparisons between specific approaches have been made, but the only side-by-side test of all three approaches using the same data is found in Miller 2018. As part of that study, extreme morpho-syntactic complexity or "polysynthesis" is argued to be the crucial test for any interface model. A side-by-side test using data from Kiowa and Saulteaux Ojibwe shows that no current model is entirely successful. Building on those results, this paper introduces the foundations for Tri-P Mapping, a new model of the phonology-syntax interface
Interface (matter · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Phase Theory
Derivation by Phase
The Syntax‐Phonology Interface
The Handbook of Phonological Theory
What is sent to spell-out is phases, not phasal complements
Major Phrase, Focus Intonation, Multiple Spell-Out (MaP, FI, MSO)
Phonological architecture
The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky)
The faculty of language
The morphology-phonology interface
Intonational phrasing
Phrasal grammatical tone in the Dogon languages
The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent
Prosodic structure between the prosodic word and the phonological phrase
Phase theory and prosodic spellout
On syntactic and phonological representations
On the Relation between Syntactic Phrases and Phonological Phrases
Multiple Spell-Out and Contraction at the Syntax-Phonology Interface
Phasal Syntax = Cyclic Phonology
A Formalization of Minimalist Syntax
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,83 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2022 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |