Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Qualitative analysis of the factors associated with whistleblowing intentions among athletes from six European countries

Dados Bibliográficos

ID7780657
AutoresJerome Toner (0000-0002-9603-4349, University of Hull, autor correspondente), John Toner (0000-0002-8846-2570), Luke Jones (0000-0001-5207-3349, University of Bath), Lucas Fairs, Lucas R W Fairs (0000-0002-3510-6230, University of Hull), Constantine Mantis, Konstantinos Mantis (0000-0003-3897-3636, Teesside University), Vassilis Barkoukis (0000-0002-7335-6062, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki), Garyfallia Daroglou (0000-0002-7066-0034, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki), John L Perry (0000-0002-7284-9252, University of Limerick), Andrei V Micle (National Anti-drug Agency), Nikolaos C Theodorou, Sabina Shakhverdieva, Marius Stoicescu (0000-0002-1602-8660, National Academy of Physical Education and Sport), Constantin Pompiliu-Nicolae (National Academy of Physical Education and Sport), Milica V Vesic (Regulatory Agency for Electronic Communications and Postal Services), Nenad Dikic (0000-0001-5245-2891, Center for Health, Exercise and Sport Sciences), Marija Andjelkovic (0009-0009-7220-2617, Regulatory Agency for Electronic Communications and Postal Services), Jesús Muñoz-Guerra Revilla, Elena García-Grimau (0000-0003-0032-4497), Miguel Martinez (0000-0002-9937-4189), Miguel A E Martínez, Javier A Amigo, Anne Schomöller, Adam R Nicholls (0000-0002-8883-5445, University of Hull)
Ano2024
Volume6
Páginas1335258-1335258
Data de publicação2024-05-07
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoFrontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367
EditoraFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fspor.2024.1335258
PMID38774279
OpenAlexW4396706806
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas39

Although whistleblowing is thought to represent an effective mechanism for detecting and uncovering doping in sport, it has yet to become a widely adopted practice. Understanding the factors that encourage or discourage whistleblowing is of vital importance for the promotion of this practice and the development of pedagogical material to enhance the likelihood of whistleblowing. The current study employed a qualitative methodology to explore the personal and organisational factors that underpin intentions to blow the whistle or that may lead to engagement in whistleblowing behaviours in sport. Thirty-three competitive athletes across a range of sports took part in a semi-structured interview which sought to explore what they would do should they encounter a doping scenario. Content analysis revealed that whistleblowing is a dynamic process characterised by the interaction of a range of personal and organisational factors in determining the intention to report PED use. These factors included moral reasoning, a desire to keep the matter “in-house”, perceived personal costs, institutional attitudes to doping, and social support. Analysis revealed a number of “intervening events”, including a perceived lack of organisational protection (e.g., ethical leadership) within some sporting sub-cultures, which present an important obstacle to whistleblowing. The intention to report doping was underpinned by a “fairness-loyalty trade-off” which involved athletes choosing to adhere to either fairness norms (which relate to a sense that all people and groups are treated equally) or loyalty norms (which reflect preferential treatment towards an in-group) when deciding whether they would blow the whistle. The promotion of fairness norms that emphasise a group's collective interests might encourage athletes to view whistleblowing as a means of increasing group cohesiveness and effectiveness and thereby increase the likelihood of this practice

Athletes · Physical therapy · Qualitative analysis · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Applied Psychology · Doping in Sports · Ethics in Business and Education · Legal Issues in Education · Medicine · Psychology

  • Structural dynamics of whistleblowing on doping in sport

    Open Access•Felix Kühnle, Larissa Thais Reich et al.•International Review for the…•2025

  • Qualitative Interviewing

    Carol A B Warren•Handbook of Interview Research•2001

  • Whistleblowing in Organizations

    Open Access•Jessica Mesmer-Magnus, Jessica R Mesmer-Magnus et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2005

  • Developing rigor in qualitative research

    Brett Smith, Kerry Rebecca Mcgannon•International Review of Sport and…•2018

  • Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects

    Andrew K Shenton•Education for Information•2004

  • The theory of planned behavior

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

  • What Makes You a Whistleblower? A Multi-Country Field Study on the Determinants of the Intention to Report Wrongdoing

    Open Access•Hengky Latan, Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2023

  • Avoiding Traps in Member Checking

    Open Access•Julie A Carlson, Julie Carlson•Qualitative Report•2014

  • The whistleblower's dilemma and the fairness–loyalty tradeoff

    Open Access•Adam Waytz, James Dungan et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2013

  • Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E Shannon•Qualitative Health Research•2005

  • Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry

    John W Creswell, Dana L Miller•Theory Into Practice•2000

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2025 - 2025 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae