Individual variability and the H* ~ L + H* contrast in English
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 7903689 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Riccardo Orrico (Radboud University Nijmegen, autor correspondente), Stella Gryllia (0000-0002-8930-5833, Radboud University Nijmegen), Jiseung Kim (0009-0000-4361-8079, Radboud University Nijmegen), Amalia Arvaniti (0000-0002-1689-1931, Radboud University Nijmegen) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Language and Cognition (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1866-9808 • E-ISSN: 1866-9859 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/langcog.2024.62 |
| OpenAlex | W4406220650 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 55 |
The H* ~ L + H* pitch accent contrast in English has been a matter of lengthy debate, with some arguing that L + H* is an emphatic version of H* and others that the accents are phonetically and pragmatically distinct. Empirical evidence is inconclusive, possibly because studies do not consider dialectal variation and individual variability. We focused on Standard Southern British English (SSBE), which has not been extensively investigated with respect to this contrast, and used Rapid Prosody Transcription (RPT) to examine differences in prominence based on accent form and function. L + H*s were rated more prominent than H*s but only when the former were used for contrast and the latter were not, indicating that participants had expectations about the form–function connection. However, they also differed substantially in which they considered primary (form or function). We replicated both the general findings and the patterns of individual variability with a second RPT study which also showed that the relative prioritization of form or function related to participant differences in empathy, musicality and autistic-like traits. In conclusion, the two accents are used to encode different pragmatics, though the form–function mapping is not clear-cut, suggesting a marginal contrast that not every SSBE speaker shares and attends to
Linguistics · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence
Generalized Additive Models
Intonational Phonology
Intonation
The Phonology of Tone and Intonation
Individual Differences in Language Acquisition and Processing
Fast Stable Restricted Maximum Likelihood and Marginal Likelihood Estimation of Semiparametric Generalized Linear Models
The Empathy Quotient
Anticipatory effects of intonation
The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ)
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Intonation and Referee Design Phenomena in the Narrative Speech of Black/Biracial Men
Exploiting random intercepts
Rhythmic Abilities Correlate with L2 Prosody Imitation Abilities in Typologically Different Languages
How to embrace variation and accept uncertainty in linguistic and psycholinguistic data analysis
Individual Differences in Language Processing
Basic notions of information structure
Empirical Investigations of the Role of Implicit Prosody in Sentence Processing
A minimal dynamical model of Intonation
What makes a word prominent? Predicting untrained German listeners' perceptual judgments
Pitch accent realization in four varieties of British English
Canadian Raising in Chicagoland
The perception of intonational emphasis
Alignment of L and H in bitonal pitch accents
Phonology, phonetics, and signal-extrinsic factors in the perception of prosodic prominence
Sound, structure and meaning
"Sagging transitions" between high pitch accents in English
Introducing Parselmouth
The centrality of metrical structure in signaling information structure
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |