Lay Public or Experts? e‐Participation in Authorization for GMO Products in the European Union
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 7998399 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Maria Paola Ferretti (0000-0001-8730-5066, University of Bremen), Matteo Lener (0000-0003-3778-2491, Fondazione FADOI) |
| Ano | 2008 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 507-525 |
| Data de publicação | 2008-11-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Review of Policy Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1541-132X • E-ISSN: 1541-1338 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00359.x |
| OpenAlex | W2020618265 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 9 |
| Referências citadas | 23 |
In the European Union, for the first time, lay people can participate directly in the procedure of assessment of GMO (genetically modified organisms) products, an exercise normally reserved for scientists and legal experts. What makes this a unique strategy of participation is that for each single application for authorization, lay people have the opportunity to express their views. This article presents the result of the first in‐depth analysis of this type of Internet participatory exercise in the first years of its implementation. It shows that, despite generally participatory technology assessment aims at deliberative consensus on technical questions, this forum is instead a way to expose the work of regulative authorities to public scrutiny and to express dissent and opposition to the European Commission policy on GMOs
Authorization · Business · Citizen journalism · Commission · Computer security · Dissent · Dissenting opinion · European commission · European union · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Public participation · Public relations · Scrutiny · Work (physics · Computer Science · Copyright and Intellectual Property · Engineering · Genetically Modified Organisms Research · Intellectual Property and Patents · Law · Public Administration
Their Members’ Voice
Less complex language, more participation
Mobilization in the European Public Sphere
Introduction
Fiscalidad indirecta del libro en Europa
EParticipation research
The European Commission's Online Consultations
Explaining Participation Bias in the European Commission's Online Consultations
Does policy context matter for citizen engagement in policymaking? Evidence from the European Commission's public consultation regime
Digital Divide
Basic Content Analysis
‘Democratising’ expertise, ‘expertising’ democracy
Precaution in public
A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management
Risk and Rationality
European Public Participation as Risk Governance
Creating Public Alienation
Why Public Participation in Risk Regulation? The Case of Authorizing GMO Products in the European Union
How biotechnology regulation sets a risk/ethics boundary
Online rulemaking
Do global technologies require global politics
Precautionary Bans or Sacrificial Lambs? Participative Risk Regulation and the Reform of the UK Food Safety Regime
The myth of the best argument
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,53 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2009 - 2024 (16) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 9 |