Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

A Mutually Comprehensible World

Native Americans, Europeans, and Play in Eighteenth-Century America

Dados Bibliográficos

ID8024377
AutoresKenneth Cohen, Kenneth J Cohen (0000-0001-9193-9344, autor correspondente)
Ano2002
Volume26
Fascículo1
Páginas67-93
Data de publicação2002-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoThe American Indian Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0095-182X • E-ISSN: 1534-1828
EditoraJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1353/aiq.2003.0002
OpenAlexW2076948379
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas34

Captain George Etherington awoke to a particularly warm day on 2 June 1763, but the "sultry" conditions hardly dampened the British celebration of their king's birthday. Even at faraway Fort Michilimackinac, on land the French had not yet formally ceded, British traders and soldiers planned festivities. It seemed to Etherington that even the local Natives wanted to participate in the holiday. In the previous months the captain had dismissed as rumor fur traders' descriptions of war belts and malicious plotting among local Ottawa and Chippewa villagers. On 2 June the Chippewa traveled across the eight-mile strait that separated their island home from the fort on the northern tip of the Lower Michigan peninsula. They invited Etherington and his garrison of nearly forty men to watch a match of "baggat'iway" or "le jeu de la crosse" organized in honor of the special day. 1 The British soldiers and traders at the fort had familiarity with Native American lacrosse. A dispatch from Etherington later that day told Major Robert Rogers in Detroit that "the Indians were playing ball as usual nigh the fort." 2 As the British walked out of the fort to observe the match, the game's unruliness would have grabbed their attention. Eighteenth-century Chippewa lacrosse had no time limit, no boundaries, and no rules restricting stick-wielding. Scores of Chippewa players competed at once, brandishing two-foot-long sticks as they either hurled the ball at one of two tall poles in an effort to score, or whacked an opponent's "racket" to dislodge the sphere. Sometimes a swing missed an opponent's stick. Observers noted that "frequently the ball carrier is disabled by being struck across the arm or leg, thus compelling his retirement." A pouch intended to hold the ball lay at the end of each racket, but the pouch measured only slightly wider than the diameter of the ball so players infrequently caught it out of the air. Once the ball hit the ground a vicious melee for control of it could last for minutes. 3 The sport's violence and disorganization might have reminded the soldiers of English football. Most noncommissioned soldiers belonged to the lower [End Page 67] sort in British society, whose traditional activities featured physical aggression. As in contemporary English football, tactical passing rarely appeared in eighteenth-century lacrosse. Long throws, individual efforts, and blurry masses of thundering feet comprised the key elements of a match. 4 Enticed by viewing such activity close to home, the British soldiers left Fort Michilimackinac to spectate. Chippewa supporters also navigated the straits to watch the game, but they gambled and cheered amongst themselves. 5 Shouts and calls from the varied clusters of spectators thus added to the cacophony of the players' voices, sticks, and feet. As spectators conversed and yelled amidst the frenzy of the match, the lacrosse ball suddenly shot skyward and floated over players, spectators, and then the palisade wall. With no boundaries to the field, players rushed past the observers into the fort. Etherington and the soldiery waited, expecting to see the ball launched back over and the herd of players galloping out of the stockade. The next thing the captain and his men saw had nothing to do with a baggat'iway ball. The chaos of the sport and the celebration of the holiday combined to distract the British soldiers. In a place where rum existed as a vital trade good, the garrison probably drank to celebrate the holiday. The Indians' dedication of the game to the king's birthday fostered British belief in Chippewa goodwill. Inebriation and a sense of trust made the British less cautious, explaining why many soldiers left the fort unarmed. The celebratory atmosphere also kept them from questioning the long overgarments worn by Chippewa spectators despite the heat of the day, and the noise around the playing field prevented them from distinguishing Chippewa calls

Ancient history · Art history · George (robot · Honor · Political science · American History and Culture · American Sports and Literature · History · Law · Sports, Gender, and Society

  • Man, Play and Games

    Roger Caillois•Man, Play and Games•1961

  • Class expression versus social control? A critique of recent trends in the social history of ‘leisure’

    Open Access•Gareth Stedman Jones•Languages of Class•1984

  • The Middle Ground

    Open Access•Richard White, Richard G White•Middle Ground•2010

  • Play, Cognitive Development, and the Social World

    Open Access•Ageliki Nicolopoulou•Human Development•2010

  • Ritual, Play, and Performance

    Michael Earley, Michael T Earley et al.•Performing Arts Journal•1978

  • The Papers of Sir William Johnson

    C H Mcilwain, James Sullivan et al.•The American Historical Review•1923

  • The Anthropology of Sport

    Tsuneo Sogawa, Sōgawa Tsuneo et al.•Asian Folklore Studies•1989

  • Sacred Revolt

    James H O'Donnell Iii, James H O’Donnell et al.•The American Historical Review•1992

  • Romance on the Middle Ground

    Daniel J Herman•Journal of the Early Republic•1999

  • Cities in the Wilderness

    Wayne E Stevens, Carl Bridenbaugh•The Mississippi Valley Historical…•1939

  • Gambler Way

    Armand S La Potin, Kathryn Gabriel•Journal of American History•1997

  • Deep play

    Open Access•Clifford Geertz•Daedalus•2005

  • Homo ludens

    Johan Huizinga•Homo Ludens•2008

  • Some pragmatic features of lexical ambiguity and simple riddles

    Open Access•E Judith Weiner, Paul De Palma•Language & Communication•1993

  • A Country between

    Gregory Evans Dowd, Michael N Mcconnell•The William and Mary Quarterly•1993

  • Theatre and Children's Pretend Play

    Natalie Crohn Schmitt•Theatre Journal•1981

  • Contact Points

    Kirsten Fischer, Andrew Cayton et al.•Western Historical Quarterly•2000

  • The Slave Code in Colonial New York

    Edwin Olson•The Journal of Negro History•1944

  • In Public Houses

    Richard P Gildrie, David W Conroy•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1997

  • A linguistic look at riddles

    Open Access•John M Dienhart•Journal of Pragmatics•1999

  • Pelts and Palisades

    John S Galbraith, Nathaniel C Hale•The William and Mary Quarterly•1960

  • A Rumor of Revolt

    Winthrop D Jordan, Thomas J Davis•The William and Mary Quarterly•1986

  • People of Chance

    Karen Halttunen, John M Findlay•Western Historical Quarterly•1987

  • People of Prowess

    David W Conroy, Nancy L Struna•The William and Mary Quarterly•1998

  • War and Culture

    Daniel Richter, Daniel K Richter•The William and Mary Quarterly•1983

  • Rum Punch and Revolution

    Bruce C Daniels, Peter Thompson•The William and Mary Quarterly•2001

  • Dispossessing the American Indian

    Reginald Horsman, Wilbur R Jacobs•Western Historical Quarterly•1973

  • Games of the North American Indians

    Janet M Cliff, Stewart Culin•Journal of American Folklore•1993

  • Riddling and the Structure of Context

    David Evans•Journal of American Folklore•1976

  • The Riddle Process

    Thomas A Green, W J Pepicello•Journal of American Folklore•1984

  • Most Pernicious Thing

    Brian James Given, Brian Given•Most Pernicious Thing•1994

  • Ambiguity, Classification and Change

    Ian Hamnett•Man•1967

  • War, Sports and Aggression

    Open Access•Richard Grey Sipes•American Anthropologist•1973

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae