Rural African Americans’ Perspectives on Mental Health
Comparing Focus Groups and Deliberative Democracy Forums
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8069731 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Greer Sullivan (autor correspondente), A M Cheney (0000-0002-4032-6692), Ann Cheney, Mary Olson (0000-0002-5927-7296), Mary K Olson (0000-0003-2011-7110), Terry Haynes (0000-0002-6002-6646), Tiffany Haynes, Keneshia Bryant, Naomi Cottoms, Christina Reaves, Geoff Curran |
| Ano | 2017 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 548-565 |
| Data de publicação | 2017-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1049-2089 • E-ISSN: 1548-6869 |
| Editora | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/hpu.2017.0039 |
| PMID | 28239018 |
| OpenAlex | W2589165405 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
| Referências citadas | 5 |
A number of approaches have been used to obtain community members' health perspectives. Health services researchers often conduct focus groups while political scientists and community groups may hold forums. To compare and contrast these two approaches, we conducted six focus groups (n = 50) and seven deliberative democracy forums (n = 233) to obtain the perspectives of rural African Americans on mental health problems in their community. Inductive qualitative analysis found three common themes: rural African Americans (1) understood stresses of poverty and racism were directly related to mental health, (2) were concerned about widespread mental illness stigma, and (3) thought community members could not identify mental health problems requiring treatment. Deductive analyses identified only minor differences in content between the two approaches. This single case study suggests that researchers could consider using deliberative democracy forums rather than focus groups with marginalized populations, particularly when seeking to mobilize communities to create community-initiated interventions
Democracy · Focus group · Health equity · Mental health · Political science · Politics · Poverty · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Public health · Public relations · Qualitative research · Racism · Social science · Sociology · Stigma (botany · Community Health and Development · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Racial and Ethnic Identity Research · Gender Studies
Citizens’ deliberation on solutions to fight urban household food waste and nexus with growing urban gardens
Testing a deliberative democracy method with citizens of African ancestry to weigh pros and cons of targeted screening for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk
African American men who become mental health advocates
Using Deliberative and Qualitative Methods to Recommend Revisions to the Medicaid Sterilization Waiting Period
Extending an Antiracism Lens to the Implementation of Precision Public Health Interventions
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,83 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |