A Taxonomy to Structure and Analyze Human–Robot Interaction
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8092624 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Linda Onnasch (0000-0002-2086-774X, autor correspondente), Eileen Roesler (0000-0002-7243-4882) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 833-849 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-06-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Journal of Social Robotics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1875-4791 • E-ISSN: 1875-4805 |
| Editora | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12369-020-00666-5 |
| OpenAlex | W3039344287 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 41 |
| Referências citadas | 55 |
Robotic systems are one of the core technologies that will shape our future. Robots already change our private and professional life by working together with humans in various domains. Evoked by this increasing trend, great variability exists in terms of robots and interaction scenarios. This has boosted research regarding shaping factors of human–robot interaction (HRI). Nevertheless, this variety hinders the comparability and the generalizability of insights. What is needed for efficient research is a structured approach that allows the analysis of superordinate attributes, making previous HRI research comparable, revealing research gaps and thus guiding future research activities. Based on the review of previous HRI frameworks we developed a new HRI taxonomy that (1) takes into account the human, the robot, the interaction and the context of the HRI, (2) is applicable to various HRI scenarios and (3) provides predefined categories to enable structured comparisons of different HRI scenarios. A graphical representation of the taxonomy, including all possible classifications, eases the application to specific HRI scenarios. To demonstrate the use and value of this taxonomy, it is applied to different studies in HRI in order to identify possible reasons for contrasting results. The exemplified applications of the taxonomy underline its value as a basis for reviews and meta-analyses. Moreover, the taxonomy offers a framework for future HRI research as it offers guidance for systematic variations of distinctive variables in HRI
Comparability · Data science · Generalizability theory · Human–computer interaction · Human–robot interaction · Robot · Robotics · Superordinate goals · Taxonomy (biology · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Mathematics · Psychology · Robot Manipulation and Learning · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Artificial Intelligence
A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of anthropomorphism in human-robot interaction
Consumer acceptance of robotic surgeons in health services
Trusting robots
Gender Encoding in Industrial Robots
Human–Robot Teaming
Designing Socially Assistive Robots Exploring Israeli and German Designers’ Perceptions
Judging a Socially Assistive Robot by Its Cover
A Framework to Explore Proximate Human-Robot Coordination
The Role of Robot Competence, Autonomy, and Personality on Trust Formation in Human–Robot Interaction
Advancing healthcare through mobile collaboration
Artificial intelligence products and their influence on individuals’ objectification
Are social media robot influencers credible? A cross-continental analysis in a fashion context
The dynamics of human–robot trust attitude and behavior — Exploring the effects of anthropomorphism and type of failure
How agent appearance and interaction mode influence user self-disclosure
What is robot abuse? A sociotechnical definition
Trust dynamics in human interaction with an industrial robot
Gaze-Cues of Humans and Robots on Pedestrian Ways
Facets of Trust and Distrust in Collaborative Robots at the Workplace
Socially Assistive Robots in Mental Healthcare
Evaluating the Effect of Speed and Acceleration on Human Factors during an Assembly Task in Human–Robot Interaction (HRI)
When is Human–Robot Joint Agency Effective? The Case of Cooperative Reaction Games
Multidimensional Measurement of Robot Morphology (RoMo)
Should Collaborative Robots Be Transparent
Going Beyond General Stress Scales
What is the Role of Anthropomorphism When Robots Make Mistakes? Trading off Anthropomorphism in Imperfect Human–Robot Collaboration
New Short Scale to Measure Workers’ Attitudes Toward the Implementation of Cooperative Robots in Industrial Work Settings
Affect-Enhancing Speech Characteristics for Robotic Communication
Teammitglied oder Werkzeug – Der Einfluss anthropomorpher Gestaltung in der Mensch-Roboter-Interaktion
Social Gaze Differs Between Humans and Androids
Fair enough? How developers and clinicians justify who receives physical assistive robotics in rehabilitation
Encountering Robots in the Field
The Influence of Gendered Physical Attributes and Personality Traits on Robot Perception
Politeness in Human–Robot Interaction
Why Context Matters
A Kind Apart
Embodiment Matters in Social HRI Research
Comply with Me
Appearance is not everything - Preferred feature combinations for care robots
(Hu)man-Like Robots
Findings From A Qualitative Field Study with An Autonomous Robot in Public
Impact of Anthropomorphic Robot Design on Trust and Attention in Industrial Human-Robot Interaction
Socially intelligent robots
Social Robotics
Toward a Framework for Levels of Robot Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction
A survey of socially interactive robots
Anthropomorphism and the social robot
Anthropomorphism and Human Likeness in the Design of Robots and Human-Robot Interaction
Revisiting the uncanny valley theory
Anthropomorphic Interactions with a Robot and Robot–like Agent
Evaluating Human-Robot Interaction
Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots
| Obras citantes distintas | 41 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 6,83 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 41 |