Asean's Albatross

Asean's Burma Policy, from Constructive Engagement to Critical Disengagement

Dados Bibliográficos

ID8092710
AutoresShahar Hameiri (0000-0003-1290-5141, autor correspondente)
Ano2008
Volume4
Fascículo3
Páginas271-293
Data de publicação2008-09-16
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAsian Security (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1479-9855 • E-ISSN: 1555-2467
EditoraTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14799850802306484
OpenAlexW2001211441
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas19

Following the abortive “Saffron Revolution” of autumn 2007, Burma's ASEAN partners were subject to the timeworn criticism that the grouping persistently fails to act against its pariah member due to its near-religious adherence to the norm of non-interference. Conversely, this paper argues that ASEAN's policy towards Burma has never been one of strict non-interference, but has always been premised on the claim that ASEAN can encourage political change there. Moreover, the non-interference principle has come under increasing pressure since the Asian financial crisis. The article tracks the evolution of ASEAN's policy, from the adoption of constructive engagement in 1988, through the gradual frustration of ASEAN's designs, to its present position of critical disengagement, arguing ASEAN's failure to take a stronger line has less to do with any binding “norms” than with the interests of the region's predominantly illiberal elites and the grouping's increasing difficulties in achieving meaningful consensus. We don't set out to change the world and our neighbors. We don't believe in it. The culture of ASEAN is that we do not interfere. (Goh Chok Tong, Prime Minister of Singapore, 1992) 1 1. “Myanmar's Monsters,” The Economist, February 29, 1992. All newspaper and magazine references sourced from www.lexisnexis.com except where otherwise indicated. ASEAN is trying to democratize Myanmar. (Nguyen Dy Nien, Foreign Minister of Vietnam, 2004) 2 2. “Japan, Vietnam, EU agree to find ways to resolve ASEM row,” Kyodo, July 2, 2004

Development economics · Disengagement theory · Economics · Economy · Foreign policy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Victory · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law