The Birth of the Herd
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8107635 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Dimitrij Mlekuž (0000-0002-6721-640X, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2013 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 150-161 |
| Data de publicação | 2013-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Society and Animals (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1063-1119 • E-ISSN: 1568-5306 |
| Editora | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15685306-12341299 |
| OpenAlex | W2081482557 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 12 |
| Referências citadas | 9 |
One of the most significant contributions of archaeology to the studies of human-animal relations is the concept of the “domestication” of non-human animals. Domestication is often seen as a specific human-animal relation that explains the ways people and animals interact. However, I argue, that “domestication” does not explain anything but has to be explained or “reassembled” by focusing on the many historically specific ways human and animals live together. Thus, the paper tackles the emergence of a “herd”, an assembly of animals, humans and things that appeared in the Neolithic, by following the ways the different agencies—human, animal, material and composite—are involved in the creation of new sociality. Living with animals is always already a material practice. It includes material culture, bodies, gestures, actions, habits, and body skills. It requires new practices and skills of flocking, herding, closing, observing, separating, amassing, and forming a queue; skills to be learned and employed by the participants. However, numerous resistances and translations are encountered and employed along the way, changing everybody in the process. In this way new bodies and persons—human and animal—are created, ultimately leading to the “herd”, a new way of association of animals, people, and things. From this perspective the agency and power is distributed and not confined to one species or group. There is no single locus of power and agency and no hegemony or “domination” but power and resistance that works from everywhere. Living with animals is not a matter of management, control or domination, but it is about making hybrid society work, a matter of politics, for all the parties involved
Biology · Domestication · Environmental ethics · Geography · Hegemony · Herding · Political science · Power (physics · Sociality · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Ecology · Law
Putting the Baa Back in Urbanism
Parts and Wholes
Women, Sheep, and Textiles
Domestication is not an ancient moment of selection for prosociality
The Stubborn Light of Things’. Landscape, Relational Agency, and Linear Earthworks in Later Prehistoric Britain
Common animals
Archaeological culture, please meet yoghurt culture
On the Fringe
The Contextual Cat
Animals as Social Actors
Riding, Ruling, and Resistance
Temporalities of human-livestock relationships in the late prehistory of the southern Levant
Discipline and Punish
Bestiary
The Wild Side of Animal Domestication
About the Beginning of the Hermeneutics of the Self
The Perception of the Environment
Between trust and domination
Early farmers in the Mediterranean Basin
The ethnography of the Cyclops
A Praxeological Approach to Subjectivation in a Material World
| Obras citantes distintas | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 11 |