Limits of data anonymity

Public trust is paramount for the well functioning of data driven healthcare activities such as digital health interventions, contact tracing or the build-up of electronic health records. As the use of personal data is the common denominator for these healthcare activities, healthcare actors have an interest to ensure privacy and anonymity of the personal data they depend on. Maintaining privacy and anonymity of personal data contribute to the trustworthiness of these healthcare activities and are associated with the public willingness to trust these activities with their personal data. An analysis of online news readership comments about the failed care.data programme in England revealed that parts of the public have a false understanding of anonymity in the context of privacy protection of personal data as used for healthcare management and medical research. Some of those commenting demanded complete anonymity of their data to be willing to trust the process of data collection and analysis. As this demand is impossible to fulfil and trust is built on a false understanding of anonymity, the inability to meet this demand risks undermining public trust. Since public concerns about anonymity and privacy of personal data appear to be increasing, a large-scale information campaign about the limits and possibilities of anonymity with respect to the various uses of personal health data is urgently needed to help the public to make better informed choices about providing personal data

Anonymity · Business · Computer security · Health care · Information privacy · Internet privacy · Personally identifiable information · Political science · Public health · Computer Science · COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection

• Advancing applied behavioral science

  Open Access•Samuel Costa, Stuart Mill et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  Incluir item

• Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour

  Open Access•Michael Wakefield, Melanie A Wakefield et al.•The Lancet•2010

  Incluir item

• On the responsible use of digital data to tackle the Covid-19 pandemic

  Open Access•Marcello Ienca, Effy Vayena•Nature Medicine•2020

  Incluir item

• How should we think about clinical data ownership

  Open Access•Angela Ballantyne•Journal of Medical Ethics•2020

  Incluir item

• Can we know if donor trust expires? About trust relationships and time in the context of open consent for future data use

  Felix Gille, Caroline Brall•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

  Incluir item

• Democratizing Health Research Through Data Cooperatives

  Open Access•Alessandro Blasimme, Effy Vayena et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2018

  Incluir item

• The care.data consensus? A qualitative analysis of opinions expressed on Twitter

  Open Access•Rebecca Hays, Gavin Daker‐white et al.•BMC Public Health•2015

  Incluir item

• Towards a broader conceptualisation of ‘public trust’ in the health care system

  Open Access•Felix Gille, Sarah Smith et al.•Social Theory & Health•2016

  Incluir item

• What is public trust in the healthcare system? A new conceptual framework developed from qualitative data in England

  Open Access•Felix Gille, Sarah Smith et al.•Social Theory & Health•2020

  Incluir item

• Trust

  Piotr Sztompka•Trust•1999

  Incluir item

• Trust and privacy in the context of user-generated health data

  Open Access•Kirsten Ostherr, Svetlana Borodina et al.•Big Data & Society•2017

  Incluir item

• Resisting big data exploitations in public healthcare

  Open Access•Paraskevas Vezyridis, Stephen Timmon•Sociology of Health & Illness•2019

  Incluir item