Transforming Residential Disability Services in Czechia Under Neoliberalism
Barriers, Tensions and Opportunities to Strengthen Rights-Based Social Work
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8249656 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Zuzana Broskevičová (0009-0006-1780-7945, University of Ostrava, autor correspondente), Alice Gojová (0000-0003-0656-6278, University of Ostrava) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 121-133 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-02-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Human Rights and Social Work (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2365-1792 • E-ISSN: 2365-1792 |
| Editora | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s41134-025-00426-3 |
| OpenAlex | W7127364160 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 35 |
This article examines the dynamics of deinstitutionalization of residential services for people with disabilities in the Czech Republic, focusing on barriers, tensions, and opportunities for social work to support disability rights. Deinstitutionalization, understood as the development of community-based services replacing large residential facilities, is analyzed across three interconnected levels: political, organizational, and everyday practice. Drawing on 62 semi-structured interviews with people with disabilities, social workers, activists, and regional representatives, complemented by field journals and analyzed using situational analysis, the study shows that at the political level, deinstitutionalization is constrained by fragile commitment, project-based funding, and neoliberal fiscal rationality. At the organizational level, competing care rationalities—paternalistic protection, neoliberal activation, and relational, person-centered practice—produce diverse interpretations of community-based services. At the everyday level, social workers navigate tensions between promoting independence and enforcing responsibility. Autonomy emerges as contested between competence-based and interdependence-oriented approaches. The article contributes to international debates on deinstitutionalization under neoliberalism and the role of social work. It emphasizes the need for political advocacy for systemic changes in disability services, the adoption of relational and rights-based frameworks of social work practice, and the recognition of interdependence as a way of rethinking autonomy. Such approaches can strengthen the rights of people with disabilities in post-socialist contexts, where deinstitutionalization remains an ongoing and uncertain process
Autonomy · Field (mathematics · Independence (probability theory · Neoliberalism (international relations · Politics · Situational ethics · Work (physics · Disability Rights and Representation · Down syndrome and intellectual disability research · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Social Work
Some Perspectives on Deinstitutionalization
Steppingstones in larger struggles. How can we combine colliding struggles in the care crisis
Eats me alive
Achieving Disability Equality
Keywords, care and neoliberalism
Personalisation and self-determination
Using Fraser’s model of ‘progressive neoliberalism’ to analyse deinstitutionalisation and community care
Living Well’ vs Neoliberal Social Welfare
Delayed deinstitutionalisation in post-socialism
Progress on deinstitutionalisation and the development of community living for persons with disabilities in Europe
Critique of deinstitutionalisation in postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe
Autonomy in long‐term care
Neoliberalism, postsocialism, disability
Why we do not need a ‘stronger’ social model of disability
Disability studies after the ontological turn
Neoliberal abandonment in disability housing provision
Not just a new house”
Challenging charitable oppression
Social Work Is a Human Rights Profession
Practicing Human Rights in Social Work
Social Work and Human Rights—Linking Two Traditions of Human Rights in Social Work
Neoliberalism and Disability
Between an Ethic of Care and an Ethic of Autonomy
Disability, work, and welfare
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |