Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

We the People

The Fourteenth Amendment and the Supreme Court

Dados Bibliográficos

ID8304002
AutoresMichelle D Deardorff (0000-0002-2849-8010, autor correspondente), Michael J Perry
Ano2000
Volume44
Fascículo1
Páginas98
Data de publicação2000-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAmerican Journal of Legal History (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0002-9319 • E-ISSN: 2161-797X
EditoraOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/846272
OpenAlexW3124367807
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas5

Several of most divisive moral conflicts that have beset us Americans in period since end of World War II have been transmuted into constitutional conflicts -- conflicts about what Constitution of United States forbids -- and resolved as such. The most prominent instances include conflicts over racial segregation, race-based affirmative action, sex-based discrimination, homosexuality, abortion, and physician-assisted suicide, each of which has been resolved -- at least in part, and at least for a time -- on basis of a claim about what Fourteenth Amendment does or does not forbid. Which of these conflicts, understood as constitutional conflicts, have been resolved as they should have been resolved? This book pursues that inquiry, but only after addressing several prior, fundamental questions: What is the What does it mean to interpret Constitution? Is Supreme Court supreme in interpreting Constitution? And precisely what norms did We People establish in making Fourteenth Amendment a part of Constitution

Amendment · First amendment · Political science · Substantive due process · Supreme court · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes

  • Christian Scripture and American Scripture

    Open Access•Gregory A Kalscheur, Gregory Kalscheur•Journal of Law and Religion•2006

  • Foundations of Public Law

    Martin Loughlin•Foundations of Public Law•2010

  • Abolishing the frontier

    Nancy Luke, Nikki Luke et al.•Social & Cultural Geography•2021

  • Sound Ideas and Absurd Consequences

    Open Access•R C Van Caenegem•European Review•2010

  • Recovering the Political Constitution

    Open Access•George Thomas•The Review of Politics•2004

Obras citantes distintas5
Citações por ano0,23
Intervalo de citações2004 - 2021 (18)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae