Karl Abraham, Sigmund Freud, and the Fate of the Seduction Theory
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8333398 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michael I Good (74 Craftsland Road Brookline, MA 0216, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1995 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 1137-1168 |
| Data de publicação | 1995-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0003-0651 • E-ISSN: 1941-2460 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/000306519504300409 |
| PMID | 8926328 |
| OpenAlex | W2041718768 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 6 |
| Referências citadas | 21 |
Even after Freud had turned his attention away from the seduction theory of neurosogenesis, his close pupil and colleague, Karl Abraham, initially sought to investigate child sexual trauma further. In two of the very first articles on child sexual molestation, Abraham proposed that sexual abuse was particularly common among neurotic and psychotic patients as a result of a "traumatophilic diathesis," a trauma-related conceptual precursor of the repetition compulsion. In their correspondence, Freud trenchantly criticized many aspects of Abraham's papers on the subject of sexual trauma, in contrast to his public endorsement of Abraham's work in this area. For largely transferential reasons that this paper attempts to elucidate, Abraham did not encourage dialogue regarding persistent questions on the seduction issue, ceased publishing on that topic, and for some time controlled his apparently deep rankle over Freud's criticisms and failure to acknowledge Abraham's contribution to the concept of the repetition compulsion. Despite their close friendship and shared intellectual enthusiasm, Freud's response to Abraham's 1907 papers, as well as Abraham's almost uniformly positive disposition toward Freud, apparently prevented Abraham from further developing his observations and ideas on seduction and also lent background to their later clash. Subsequently, there was virtually no further psychoanalytic investigation of the subject of child sexual abuse until the issue arose briefly with Ferenczi in the early 1930s, and only occasionally after that for the next fifty years. The death of Abraham, and then Ferenczi, shortly after disputes with Freud may be among the factors that had an inhibiting effect on an earlier reconsideration of the seduction theory by others. Abraham's previously unheralded concept of traumatophilia has relevance to current clinical controversy regarding constitution and sexual trauma
Oedipus complex · Poison control · Psychoanalysis · Psychoanalytic theory · Repetition (rhetorical device) · Sexual abuse · Subject (documents) · Suicide prevention · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychoanalysis and Social Critique · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
False memories, negative affects, and psychic reality
Unlaid Ghosts
False memories, negative affects, and psychic reality
Abraham's discovery of the ‘bad mother’
Suggestion and Veridicality in the Reconstruction of Sexual Trauma, or can a Bait of Suggestion Catch a Carp of Falsehood
Screen Reconstructions
Group psychology and the analysis of the ego.
The language of psychoanalysis
Freud's Discovery of Psychoanalysis
Memories, Dreams and Reflections
Psychiatry and the Cinema
Pain, Aggression, Fantasy, and Concepts of Sadomasochism
The “Dissolution” of the Oedipus Complex
Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety
Witnessing Pornography and the Reconstruction of Suspected Child Sexual Molestation
Establishing Trauma
Incest—See under Oedipus Complex”
The Reconstruction of Early Childhood Trauma
Signal Affects and Our Psychoanalytic Confusion of Tongues
A Patient Who Was Not Sexually Abused
The Seduction Hypothesis
Belief and Suggestion in the Recovery of Memories of Childhood Sexual Abuse
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1996 - 2019 (24) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |