On the Existence of Spacetime Structure
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8397276 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Erik Curiel (0000-0002-5812-3033, Munich School of Philosophy, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2018 |
| Volume | 69 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 447-483 |
| Data de publicação | 2018-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0007-0882 • E-ISSN: 1464-3537 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjps/axw014 |
| OpenAlex | W2100880319 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 7 |
| Referências citadas | 36 |
I examine the debate between substantivalists and relationalists about the ontological character of spacetime and conclude it is not well posed. I argue that the hole argument does not bear on the debate, because it provides no clear criterion to distinguish the positions. I propose two such precise criteria and construct separate arguments based on each to yield contrary conclusions, one supportive of something like relationalism and the other of something like substantivalism. The lesson is that one must fix an investigative context in order to make such criteria precise, but different investigative contexts yield inconsistent results. I examine questions of existence about spacetime structures other than the spacetime manifold itself to argue that it is more fruitful to focus on pragmatic issues of physicality, a notion that lends itself to several different explications, all of philosophical interest, none privileged a priori over any of the others. I conclude by suggesting an extension of the lessons of my arguments to the broader debate between realists and instrumentalists. 1 Introduction2 The Hole Argument3 Limits of Spacetimes4 Pointless Constructions5 The Debate between Substantivalists and Relationalists6 Existence and Physicality: An Embarassment of Spacetime Structures7 Valedictory Remarks on Realism and Instrumentalism, and the Structure of Our Knowledge of Physics
Argument (complex analysis) · Construct (python library) · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Extension (predicate logic) · Focus (optics) · Physics · Realism · Scientific realism · Spacetime · Computer Science · Philosophy · Philosophy, Science, and History · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Mathematical Responses to the Hole Argument
On geometric objects, the non-existence of a gravitational stress-energy tensor, and the uniqueness of the Einstein field equation
The Hole Argument without the notion of isomorphism
Representational schemes for theories with symmetry
Careful with those scissors, Eugene! Against the observational indistinguishability of spacetimes
Scientific Realism Made Effective
Structuralism in the philosophy of physics
General Relativity
Geometric Possibility
Can we know the global structure of spacetime
No superluminal propagation for classical relativistic and relativistic quantum fields
Substances and space-time
The Analysis of Singular Spacetimes
General Relativity Needs No Interpretation
What Is a Physically Reasonable Space-Time
Why General Relativity Does Need an Interpretation
Against the Excesses of Quantum Gravity
Buckets of Water and Waves of Space
World Enough and Space-Time
The Lessons of the Hole Argument
Classical Mechanics Is Lagrangian; It Is Not Hamiltonian
On Dynamics, Indiscernibility, and Spacetime Ontology
The Hole Truth
Mass–Energy–Momentum
Relationism and Possible Worlds 1
Absolute versus Relational Spacetime
Isaac Newton's Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,78 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 6 |