Incorporating geographic context into coyote and wolf livestock depredation research
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8423304 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Kyle Plotsky (0000-0003-3217-8105, University of Calgary, autor correspondente), Shelley M Alexander (University of Calgary), Marco Musiani (0000-0002-6097-5841, University of Calgary), Dianne Draper (University of Calgary) |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 450-461 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0008-3658 • E-ISSN: 1541-0064 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/cag.12765 |
| OpenAlex | W4293235741 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 52 |
Applying research results to new locations and situations can be confounded by differences in the geographic context between the original and the applied study sites. Replication studies and meta‐analyses may be similarly hindered. We investigated how often canid management research reports (e.g., journal articles, conference proceedings) included information on historical/current lethal control, alternative prey availability, landscape features, and seasonal and settlement characteristics. We included experimental research published between 1970 and 2018, focusing on livestock depredations by wolves and coyotes in North America. Reporting on contextual factors was highly variable; seasonal context was included in 83% of research findings; human settlement characteristics were reported in only 8%. Contextual information was more common in journal versus grey literature, and in reports with academic versus government‐affiliated primary authors. Discussions of the effects of contextual factors on livestock depredation mitigation strategies were underdeveloped. Yet, geographic context of research is vital; it can alter animal behaviour and reduce the efficacy of applied mitigation. We suggest reporting guidelines to improve comparisons and meta‐analysis opportunities, which may enhance comparisons and management decision making
Archaeology · Biology · Business · Context (archaeology) · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Government (linguistics) · Grey literature · Habitat · Livestock · MEDLINE · Political science · Settlement (finance) · Wildlife management · Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies · Ecology · Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies · Environmental Science · Forestry · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Roses RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses
Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews
Consort 2010 Explanation and Elaboration
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Geographically Weighted Regression
The rules we make that coyotes break
The Ceeder database of evidence reviews
Snow‐tracking and GIS
Does geographic context influence employability‐motivated volunteering? The role of area‐level material insecurity and urbanicity
The integration of Human and Physical Geography revisited
The Uncertain Geographic Context Problem
The Nature of Geography
Intervention
Cougar - Human Entanglements and the Biopolitical Un/Making of Safe Space
Motivations and Methods for Replication in Geography
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |