The Battle of Brunanburh

Disputes about where the battle of Brunanburh in 937 was fought continue, but in recent years one particular area, Yorkshire, has been proposed by Michael Wood. This article re-examines some of the strategic detail underlying assumptions about York as the goal of the invading forces and the Humber as their place of arrival and departure. It is demonstrated that lines of Castleford’s Chronicle suggested by Wood to refer to the Brunanburh campaign refer to Athelstan’s expedition of 934. The lack of interest of northern sources in the battle suggests that it was not fought in the north-east. The paper then analyses the evidence proposed to support the identifications of Burghwallis as Brunanburh and Went Hill as We(o)ndun and demonstrates that these identifications are implausible. It is concluded that the “Yorkshire context” of the battle argued for by Wood is not supported by the evidence he deploys

Ancient history · Archaeology · Battle · Context (archaeology · Genealogy · Byzantine Studies and History · Historical Studies of British Isles · Medieval Literature and History · History

• Oxford Medieval Texts: Symeon of Durham: Libellus de Exordio atque Procursu Istius, hoc est Dunhelmensis, Ecclesie: Tract on the Origins and Progress of this the Church of Durham

  Symeon of Durham Symeon of Durham, Symeon of Durham et al.•Libellus de exordio atque…•2000

  Incluir item

• Some Latin poems as evidence for the reign of Athelstan

  Open Access•Michael Lapidge•Anglo-Saxon England•1980

  Incluir item

• The Chronology of the Parker Chronicle, 890–970

  Richard Vaughan•The English Historical Review•1954

  Incluir item

• The Patrimony of St. Cuthbert

  Edmund Craster•The English Historical Review•1954

  Incluir item

• The Red Book of Durham

  H H E Craster•The English Historical Review•1925

  Incluir item

• Escaping from Brunanburh and John of Worcester

  Open Access•Paul Cavill•English Studies•2022

  Incluir item