Costa Rica in 1948
Cold War or Local War
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8872097 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Marcia Olander (autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1996 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 465-493 |
| Data de publicação | 1996-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | The Americas A Quarterly Review of Latin American History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0003-1615 • E-ISSN: 1533-6247 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1008474 |
| OpenAlex | W2052362470 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 16 |
The years following World War Two produced a strong resurgence of U.S. intervention in Central America and the Caribbean couched in Cold War terms. Although the U.S. intervention in Guatemala to overthrow the government of Jacobo Arbenz in 1954 has generally been seen as the first case of Cold War covert anti-Communist intervention in Latin America, several scholars have raised questions about U.S. involvement in a 1948 Costa Rican civil war in which Communism played a critical role. In a 1993 article in The Americas , Kyle Longley argued that “the U.S. response to the Costa Rican Revolution of 1948, not the Guatemalan affair, marked the origins of the Cold War in Latin America.” The U.S. “actively interfered,” and achieved “comparable results in Costa Rica as in Guatemala: the removal of a perceived Communist threat.” Other authors have argued, even, that the U.S. had prepared an invasion force in the Panama Canal Zone to pacify the country. The fifty years of Cold War anti-Communism entitles one to be skeptical of U.S. non-intervention in a Central American conflict involving Communism. Costa Ricans, aware of a long tradition of U.S. intervention in the region, also assumed that the U.S. would intervene. Most, if not all, were expecting intervention and one key government figure described U.S. pressure as like “the air, which is felt, even if it cannot be seen.” Yet, historians must do more than just “feel” intervention. Subsequent Cold War intervention may make it difficult to appraise the 1948 events in Costa Rica objectively. Statements like Longley's that “it is hard to believe that in early 1948 ... Washington would not favor policies that ensured the removal of the [Communist Party] Vanguard,” although logical, do not coincide with the facts of the U.S. role in the conflict
Communism · Development economics · Economic history · Economic interventionism · Government (linguistics · Intervention (counseling · Latin Americans · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · History · Law · Medicine · Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America
Arming the Free World
Eisenhower and Latin America
The Last Years of the Monroe Doctrine, 1945-1993
Shattered hope
Behind the Throne
Don Pepe
Central America and the United States
Peaceful Costa Rica, The First Battleground
The Dismantling of the Good Neighbor Policy
Latin America, the United States and the Birth of Israel
The United States and Central America, 1944-1949
Eisenhower and Latin America
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,05 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1970 - 2018 (49) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |