Performing Developability

” Generating threat and value in private land conservation

Dados Bibliográficos

ID8943333
AutoresKelly Kay (0000-0003-1824-2617, University of California, Los Angeles, autor correspondente)
Ano2021
Volume128
Páginas37-45
Data de publicação2021-12-02
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoGeoforum (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0016-7185 • E-ISSN: 1872-9398
EditoraElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.11.022
OpenAlexW4200077605
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas5
Referências citadas31

The majority of private conservation in the United States today is financed by the state and federal tax systems (Kay, 2016), with conservation organizations and private landowners relying in particular on what is one of the “most generous charitable deductions in the federal tax code” (Elkind, 2017). While this has incentivized huge amounts of land protection, it has also increasingly attracted fraudulent activity. In this paper, I look at two cases: the growing market in syndicated conservation easements in Georgia, and the long-troubled program for tradeable conservation easement tax credits in Colorado. These cases are not intended to be comparative, and the choice of such extreme cases is intended to highlight worst-case outcomes of everyday logics and practices. Since conservation easements are required to be valued by a qualified real estate appraiser using an indirect before-and-after valuation approach rooted in notions of highest and best use, landowners must be able to demonstrate development threat in order to be compensated for their easement donation. As a result, those properties under greatest threat of conversion will produce the greatest compensation for their owners. Understanding how this process works allows speculators and developers to be able to mimic the same types of threats that are understood to organically produce valuable conservation easements, generating large financial windfalls. I describe this process as “performing developability,” and drawing on study findings, I highlight three major strategies by which development potential can be performed: spatial, volumetric, and temporal, providing empirical substantiation for each. The paper concludes by questioning the logics of using real estate techniques to value conservation benefits and raises the need for geographers—particularly those interested in market-making—to engage more closely with the practices and logics of property appraisal

Business · Easement · Economics · Law and economics · Order (exchange · Political science · Process (computing · Public economics · Real estate · Tax deduction · Tax reform · Threatened species · Valuation (finance · Computer Science · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Finance · Forest Management and Policy · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Law