The Exclusion Controversy, Pamphleteering, and Locke's Two Treatises

It is now more than twenty years since Peter Laslett argued that the Exclusion controversy and not the Revolution of 1688 was the occasion of the composition of Locke's Two treatises. Nevertheless, scholarly interpretations still resist treating Two treatises as mainly an activist tract and persist in characterizing it always as something loftier, viz. ‘political philosophy’, ‘systematic moral apologia’, and the like. Resistance to the implications of a rigorous historical mode of interpretation is surely part of the problem. The perennial or transcendent purposes with which the classics are haloed often get diminished in too specific an historical location of the motives and situation of the author. Oddly, however, even critics friendly to a strictly historical approach have hesitated before the implications of Laslett's dicta that Locke wrote as a whig pamphleteer and for Shaftesbury's purposes. This, in turn, parallels the widespread contempt felt by many contemporary English historians (Locke's interpreters among them) for the early whigs. Righteous indignation against the whigs is even detectable in those modern writings from which we take our view of the whig Exclusion pamphleteers

Art · Contempt · Indignation · Interpretation (philosophy · Literature · Parallels · Political science · Politics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classics · History · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence

• The Anti-Catholic Roots of Liberal and Republican Conceptions of Freedom in English Political Thought

  Clement Fatovic•Journal of the History of Ideas•2005

  Incluir item

• The Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America

  Open Access•Lee Ward•Politics of Liberty in England…•2004

  Incluir item

• Returning to Rawls

  Open Access•Richard Marens•Journal of Business Ethics•2007

  Incluir item

• Hobbes’s and Locke’s Contract Theories

  Deborah Baumgold•Critical Review of International…•2005

  Incluir item

• The Rulers now on Earth’

  Open Access•Charles D Tarlton•The Historical Journal•1985

  Incluir item

• John Locke and Richard Ashcraft's Revolutionary Politics

  David Wootton•Political Studies•1992

  Incluir item

• The Political Thought of John Locke

  Open Access•J Dunn•Political Thought of John Locke•1969

  Incluir item

• The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman

  Caroline Robbins•Eighteenth Century Commonwealthman•1959

  Incluir item

• The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law

  Open Access•J G A Pocock•Ancient Constitution and the…•1987

  Incluir item

• The Growth of Responsible Government in Stuart England

  GERALD P BODET, Clayton Roberts•University of Toronto Law Journal•1967

  Incluir item

• John Locke's Political Philosophy

  Aaron Wernham, A G Wernham et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•1951

  Incluir item

• Political Philosophy Belimed

  Open Access•Stewart Edwards•Political Studies•1969

  Incluir item

• The Idea of Conquest in Controversies Over the 1688 Revolution

  Martyn P Thompson•Journal of the History of Ideas•1977

  Incluir item

• The First Whigs

  Harold Hulme, J R Jones•The William and Mary Quarterly•1962

  Incluir item

• That Grand Whig, Milton

  James Holly Hanford, George F Sensabaugh•The William and Mary Quarterly•1953

  Incluir item