IV. The Origins of the Birmingham Caucus

In 1868 the Birmingham Liberal Association won the first of a series of dazzling victories in parliamentary and municipal elections. Contemporaries immediately recognized the presence of a new phenomenon in English politics: disciplined control of a mass electorate by a tightly organized party apparatus. At first glance the Liberal machine seemed un-English, and the Tories gleefully imported an American epithet to describe it. The traditional interpretation of the caucus, as set forth by Ostrogorski, followed contemporary opinion in emphasizing the novelty of the institution. In his view, ‘the organization of the electoral masses’ by the Liberal Association represented a sharp break with the past. He traced its origin to the minority clause of the Reform Act of 1867, which gave each Birmingham elector two votes to divide among the candidates for three seats, thus challenging the Liberals to develop an organization capable of circumventing the Act. After their success in the ‘vote as you are told’ election of 1868, the Liberal politicians, according to Ostrogorski, continued to use the caucus as a contrivance for manipulating an electorate that otherwise might have exercised independent judgment. This interpretation remains of considerable value, particularly in its treatment of the oligarchic implications of modern democracy. Nevertheless, Ostrogorski’s analysis tends to be misleading and one-sided. The Liberal politicians, like the priests in Voltaire’s account of the history of religion, are depicted as consciously constructing an institution ex nihilo to meet their own needs and purposes. Ostrogorski attributes too much to calculation and too little to the historical process that created the materials out of which the caucus was built and the foundations on which it rested

Caucus · Democracy · Epithet · Institution · Interpretation (philosophy · Liberal Party · Liberalism · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Value (mathematics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classics · History · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence · Public Administration · Religion and Society Interactions

• Conservative Parties and the Birth of Modern Democracy in Europe

  Open Access•Daniel Ziblatt•Conservative Parties and the…•2017

  Incluir item

• Chartists and freemen in Coventry, 1838–1860∗

  Peter Searby•Social History•1977

  Incluir item

• Electoral strategy under open voting

  Open Access•Jeremy Corlett Mitchell•Public Choice•1976

  Incluir item

• John Bright and Joseph Chamberlain

  Open Access•Roland Quinault•The Historical Journal•1985

  Incluir item

• VI. The Irish Question and Liberal Politics, 1886–1894

  Open Access•David Hamers, D A Hamer•The Historical Journal•1969

  Incluir item

• Reinterpreting ‘Factory Politics’ in Bury, Lancashire, 1868–1880

  Open Access•Victoria Barbary, V C BARBARY•The Historical Journal•2008

  Incluir item

• Two Nations

  Open Access•E Spencer Wellhofer•American Political Science Review•1985

  Incluir item

• Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties

  A Lawrence Lowell, M Ostrogorski et al.•The American Historical Review•1903

  Incluir item

• The Chartist Crisis in Birmingham

  Open Access•Trygve R Tholfsen•International Review of Social…•1958

  Incluir item

• The Industrial Development of Birmingham and the Black Country, 1860-1927

  H L Beales, G C Allen et al.•Economica•1930

  Incluir item

• The Industrial Development of Birmingham and the Black Country, 1860-1927

  T S Ashton, G C Allen et al.•The Economic Journal•1930

  Incluir item

• The Origins of the National Liberal Federation

  Francis H Herrick•The Journal of Modern History•1945

  Incluir item

• Hunger and Politics in 1842

  G Kitson Clark•The Journal of Modern History•1953

  Incluir item