Strategies and Stratagems for the Employment of Women in the British Civil Service, 1919–1939

When faced in 1920 with allegations of unfair treatment of women civil servants, Austen Chamberlain, the chancellor of the exchequer, expressed some surprise and countered that the postwar settlement not only ‘marked a great advance in the position of women in the Civil Service, but appeared to provide the most suitable machinery for ensuring that the opportunities afforded to women in the Civil Service should be full and liberal. Indeed...the proposals are the best that could be adopted in the interests of women themselves.’ Was the chancellor right? And if not, why not? Such questions may seem surprising or even wilfully obscure to more traditional administrative historians: of what importance anyway are the real or imagined grievances of a gaggle of women, most of whom were humble rank and file? That view, however, is appropriate only if the civil service is taken at its own estimation or, rather, that of its masters, those men at the top in what was called, variously, the first division, class I, and the administrative grade. Behind its façade of bland homogeneity raged both class and gender conflict. The former has been studied at some length. The latter has not. In beginning to remedy this deficiency this article inspects the treatment by the civil service, with the Treasury at its head, of one category of staff, women; an inspection which illuminates its public image as a rational and professional body representative of society and responsive to its needs

Business · Civil servants · Civil service · Economics · Economy · Exchequer · Political science · Politics · Public service · Service (business · Settlement (finance · Sociology · Surprise · Treasury · Finance · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration

• Women Workers And Technological Change In Europe In The Nineteenth And twentieth century

  Gertjan deGroot, Alan Pitkethly et al.•Women Workers and Technological…•1995

  Incluir item

• Femmes britanniques et pratiques internationales de justice sociale dans la première moitié du XX e siècle

  Olga Hidalgo-Weber•Le Mouvement social•2018

  Incluir item

• In a Minority in Male Spaces

  Open Access•Helen Glew•Open Library of Humanities•2020

  Incluir item

• Women's work, gender conflict, and labour markets in Europe, 1500-1900

  Katrina Honeyman, Jordan Goodman et al.•The Economic History Review•1991

  Incluir item

• Dr Mary Louisa Gordon (1861–1941)

  Open Access•Deborah Cheney•Feminist Legal Studies•2010

  Incluir item

• Front Londonderry to London

  Colin G Pooley•Immigrants & Minorities•1999

  Incluir item

• A General Equilibrium Model of Discrimination and Its Effects on Incomes

  Open Access•Zafiris Tzannatos•Scottish Journal of Political…•1987

  Incluir item

• Partnership Not Prejudice”

  Open Access•Catherine Babikian•Journal of British Studies•2021

  Incluir item

• From the Housewife’s Point of View’

  Open Access•Krista Cowman•The English Historical Review•2015

  Incluir item

• Banking, bureaucracy and the career

  Alan Mckinlay•Business History•2013

  Incluir item

• Women and Equality

  Open Access•Keith Grint•Sociology•1988

  Incluir item

• The blackcoated worker

  David Lockwood•The blackcoated worker•1989

  Incluir item

• The blackcoated worker

  David Lockwood•The blackcoated worker

  Incluir item

• Women Workers in the First World War

  Gail Braybon•Women Workers in the First World…•2012

  Incluir item

• Women in the Civil Service

  Open Access•ELIZABETH BRIMELOW•Public Administration•1981

  Incluir item

• Women Servants of the State, 1870-1938. A History of Women in the Civil Service

  Clara E Collet, Hilda Martindale•The Economic Journal•1939

  Incluir item

• The Failure of Social Reform

  Philip Abrams•Past & Present•1963

  Incluir item

• Clerical Unions in the Civil Service

  Herbert Block, B V Humphreys et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1959

  Incluir item