The Legal Status of the Petition of Right

One hundred years ago the most scholarly of the whig historians, Samuel Rawson Gardiner, gave the Petition of Right a leading place in his interpretation of early Stuart England, as the beginning of a constitutional revolution in which parliament took sovereignty from an autocratic Stuart monarchy. To Gardiner this was part of a movement, his portrayal of which was coloured by ideas of patriotism and moral good, and which had the sanction of historical inevitability. Clearly there were serious flaws built into Gardiner's view: teleology, narrowness of theme, implausible simplicity, belief in inevitable progress, and the selective attribution of unconscious motives to men such as Sir John Eliot. Recent historiography has demonstrated the inherent weaknesses of the traditional liberal-whig and indeed the Marxist views of this period. A most stimulating revisionist argument and a whole industry of scholarship seem likely to reduce Gardiner's work to a great narrative, graced frequently with sane judgement, but in conceptual terms virtually abolished. Nevertheless the Petition of Right remains a salient and significant feature of the early Stuart landscape. Conrad Russell has established clearly that the making of the Petition was important as the culmination of a national war crisis and as an ideological watershed. Indicative of an emerging fear of subversion – of the alteration of government and religion together – it anticipated the attitudes of those in the Long Parliament who came to oppose the Caroline regime. The Petition needs to be given due attention in seeking to understand the important relationship between the political events of the 1620s and those of the 1640s

Historiography · Ideology · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Subversion · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law

• Law, Politics and Society in Early Modern England

  Christopher W Brooks•Law, Politics and Society in…•2010

  Incluir item

• Absolutism and royalism

  Open Access•Johann P Sommerville•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  Incluir item

• Sovereignty and the mixed constitution

  Julian H Franklin•Jean Bodin•2017

  Incluir item

• Sovereignty and the mixed constitution

  Open Access•Julian H Franklin•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  Incluir item

• Pufendorf

  Open Access•Alfred Dufour•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  Incluir item

• Catholic resistance theory, Ultramontanism, and the royalist response, 1580—1620

  Open Access•J H M Salmon•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  Incluir item

• The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700

  Open Access•Mark Goldie, James H Burns•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  Incluir item

• Christian obedience and authority, 1520–1550

  Open Access•Francis Oakley•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  Incluir item

• Leveller democracy and the Puritan Revolution

  Open Access•David Wootton•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  Incluir item

• Calvinism and resistance theory, 1550–1580

  Open Access•Robert M Kingdon•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  Incluir item

• Italian political thought, 1450–1530

  Open Access•Nicolai Rubinstein•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  Incluir item

• Transalpine humanism

  Open Access•Brendan Bradshaw•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  Incluir item

• Charles I

  Mark A Kishlansky, Mark Kishlansky•Past & Present•2005

  Incluir item

• A Body Worth Having

  Open Access•Ed Cohen, Edward Cohen•Theory Culture & Society•2008

  Incluir item

• Rumor and “Common Fame”

  Open Access•David Coast•Journal of British Studies•2016

  Incluir item

• The Arguments in King's Bench in 1629 concerning the Imprisonment of John Selden and Other Members of the House of Commons

  Open Access•John Reeve•Journal of British Studies•1986

  Incluir item

• Is Public Law Ordinary

  Open Access•Mark Walters, Mark D Walters•Modern Law Review•2012

  Incluir item

• Arguments on billeting and martial law in the parliament of 1628

  Open Access•Paul Christianson•The Historical Journal•1994

  Incluir item

• A Low Road to Extinction? Supply and Redress of Grievances in the Parliaments of the 1620s

  Open Access•Thomas Cogswell•The Historical Journal•1990

  Incluir item

• Parliaments and English Politics 1621–1629

  Conrad Russell•Parliaments and English politics,…•1979

  Incluir item

• Charles I and the Popish Plot

  Thomas Cogswell•Manuscripta•1984

  Incluir item

• The History of the Rebellion and Civil Wars in England

  first earl of Clarendon Edward Hyde, WILLIAM DUNN MACRAY•1888

  Incluir item

• Britain and The Netherlands

  Open Access•A C Duke, C A Tamse•Britain and the Netherlands•1982

  Incluir item

• History of England from the Accession of James I to the Outbreak of the Civil War, 1603–1642

  Open Access•Samuel Rawson Gardiner•History of England from the…•2011

  Incluir item

• The Painful Labour of Mr. Elsyng

  Elizabeth Read Foster•Transactions of the American…•1972

  Incluir item

• Petitions and the Petition of Right

  Open Access•Elizabeth Read Foster•Journal of British Studies•1974

  Incluir item

• Arminianism and the English Parliament, 1624–1629

  Open Access•Hillel Schwartz•Journal of British Studies•1973

  Incluir item

• Martial Law and the Petition of Right

  Lindsay Boynton•The English Historical Review•1964

  Incluir item

• Sir Edward Stanhope's Advice to Thomas Wentworth, Viscount Wentworth, Concerning the Deputyship of Ireland

  Open Access•Perez Zagorin•The Historical Journal•1964

  Incluir item

• The Origins of the Petition of Right Reconsidered Further

  Open Access•Michael B Young•The Historical Journal•1984

  Incluir item

• The Origins of the Petition of Right Reconsidered

  Open Access•J A Guy•The Historical Journal•1982

  Incluir item

• Sir Edward Coke and "The Grievances of the Commonwealth," 1621-1628

  J P Kenyon, Stephen D White•American Journal of Legal History•1980

  Incluir item

• The Rise of Arminianism Reconsidered

  Peter White•Past & Present•1983

  Incluir item

• Revisionism Revised

  Theodore K Rabb, Theodore Κ Rabb•Past & Present•1981

  Incluir item