Finding Stars
Mapping the Geography of the World's Scientific Elites
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8964366 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Andrés Rodríguez-Pose (0000-0002-8041-0856, Department of Geography and Environment London School of Economics London UK, autor correspondente), Leiboyu Xiang (Department of Geography and Environment London School of Economics London UK), Neil Lee (0000-0002-4138-7163, Department of Geography and Environment London School of Economics London UK) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-12-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0020-2754 • E-ISSN: 1475-5661 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/tran.70055 |
| OpenAlex | W4417450820 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 51 |
This paper presents the first systematic city‐level mapping of global scientific talent, analysing the top 200,000 star scientists across 3635 cities worldwide annually between 2019 and 2023. We use a novel Knowledge Generation Index (KGI) that combines researcher quantity with research impact to reveal extreme spatial concentration in knowledge production. Just four cities—New York, Boston, London and the San Francisco Bay Area—host 12% of the world's star scientists, while much of the Global South remains virtually excluded from frontier research. Beijing's ascent into the global top 10 represents a rare challenge to established hierarchies. Our analysis uncovers striking disciplinary variations. Resource‐intensive fields like clinical medicine cluster heavily, and traditionally dispersed disciplines are increasingly gravitating towards major hubs. Despite these differences, concentration is intensifying across most scientific fields. Even the pandemic's remote collaboration experiment failed to level the playing field. Established innovation centres continued strengthening their advantages while peripheral regions fell further behind. Overall, we find that geography remains destiny, with profound implications for innovation policy confronting widening spatial inequalities in global scientific capacity
Cluster (spacecraft · Discipline · Diversity (politics · Fell · Frontier · Human geography · Inequality · Conferences and Exhibitions Management · Global Urban Networks and Dynamics · Historical Geography and Geographical Thought
The Rise and Fall of Urban Economies
Innovation Prone and Innovation Averse Societies
What drives university-industry collaboration? Research excellence or firm collaboration strategy
Peer Effects in Science
Superstar Extinction
Roads and Innovation
Stars as catalysts
The territorial dynamics of innovation
Buzz
Local embeddedness of knowledge spillover agents
Is R&D investment in lagging areas of Europe worthwhile? Theory and empirical evidence
Brain drain or brain bank? The impact of skilled emigration on poor-country innovation
Disruptive innovation and spatial inequality
The local economic impact of the Swedish higher education system
The dark side of the geography of innovation
Who Are the Knowledge Brokers in Regional Systems of Innovation? A Multi-Actor Network Analysis
Unseen costs
Understanding the geographical distribution of innovation in England
The geography of duplicated inventions
Research and Development, Spillovers, Innovation Systems, and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe
Increasing Returns and Economic Geography
Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth
Endogenous Technological Change
Geography and legal expertise
The impact agenda and geographies of curiosity
Troubling economic geography
Research excellence in a world of change
No national research assessment here. A Canadian counterfactual
Rethinking City Population Growth
Cultural Diversity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |