The Safavid Threat and Juristic Authority in the Ottoman Empire During the 16th Century

Dados Bibliográficos

ID8969404
AutoresAbdurrahman Atçıl (0000-0002-9412-9387, İstanbul Şehir University, autor correspondente)
Ano2017
Volume49
Fascículo2
Páginas295-314
Data de publicação2017-04-20
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoInternational Journal Middle East Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0020-7438 • E-ISSN: 1471-6380
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s002074381700006x
OpenAlexW2606734805
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas6
Referências citadas16

This article investigates the opinions of three senior Ottoman jurists, Sarıgörez (d. 1522), Kemalpaşazade (d. 1534), and Ebussuud (d. 1574), on the subject of the Safavids and their supporters. Historians have treated these opinions as part of the vast polemical literature uniformly intended to justify an impending Ottoman attack against their Safavid rivals. Questioning the notion that all authors shared an undifferentiated attitude, this article underlines that, unlike most polemical literature, the opinions of these three jurists focused on the religiolegal aspects of the Safavid issue and varied and evolved in line with changing historical realities, the jurists’ divergent assessments of the Safavid threat, and their preference for different jurisprudential doctrines. Based on an analysis of the opinions, I argue that these jurists assumed a high degree of autonomy as producers and interpreters of the law and thus did not necessarily feel obliged to legitimate or excuse every imperial action

Action (physics · Autonomy · Economics · Excuse · Ottoman empire · Political science · Preference · Subject (documents · Families in Therapy and Culture · History · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Ottoman and Turkish Studies · Philosophy