Field Construction
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8970801 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Elliott Colla (College of Islamic and Arabic Studies, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2011 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 722-724 |
| Data de publicação | 2011-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Journal Middle East Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0020-7438 • E-ISSN: 1471-6380 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020743811000936 |
| OpenAlex | W4243185593 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 1 |
By every indicator—methodology, citations, paper titles—students of Arabic literature have been courting “theory” for decades. From the 1970s on, scholars have approached classical and modern Arabic literature with theoretical models that draw explicitly on structuralism, deconstruction, psychoanalysis, feminism, Marxism, semiotics, performance studies, and so on. That said, until recently the mainstream of modern Arabic studies continued to use methods inherited from Orientalist scholars working on classical texts
Arabic · Art · Deconstruction (building · Epistemology · Feminism · Field (mathematics · Linguistics · Literature · Mainstream · Orientalism · Post structuralism · Pure mathematics · Semiotics · Sociology · Structuralism (philosophy of science · Engineering · Gender Studies · History · Islamic Studies and History · Mathematics · Philosophy · Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |