Experimental Psychology and Duhem's Problem
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8975725 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sam S Rakover (autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2003 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 45-66 |
| Data de publicação | 2003-03-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0021-8308 • E-ISSN: 1468-5914 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-5914.00205 |
| OpenAlex | W2077693019 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 16 |
Sam S. Rakover, Experimental Psychology and Duhem's Problem, pp. 45–66. The paper proposes a practical answer to Duhem's problem within the framework of experimental psychology. First, this problem is briefly discussed; second, two studies in psychology are presented illustrating how theories are tested. Thirdly, based on the foregoing, an approach called the “Empirical Reasoning” (ER) is developed and justified. It is shown that the ER approach can successfully cope with Duhem's problem. Finally, the ER approach and the Error Statistics approach of Mayo are critically compared with regard to Duhem's problem
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Epistemology · Experimental psychology · Theoretical psychology · Advanced Text Analysis Techniques · Cognitive Science and Education Research · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology
Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge
Measurement in Psychology
Two storage mechanisms in free recall
Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
Data, Phenomena, and Reliability
Experimental Practice and an Error Statistical Account of Evidence
Duhem's Problem, the Bayesian Way, and Error Statistics, or “What's Belief Got to Do with It?”
Response to Howson and Laudan
How About Bust? Factoring Explanatory Power Back into Theory Evaluation
Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century
Main Trends in Recent Philosophy
| Citações por ano | 1 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Altamente citado | Não |