The Difaqane
The Mfecane in the Southern Sotho Area, 1822–24
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 8978764 |
|---|---|
| Autores | William F Lye (autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1967 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 107-131 |
| Data de publicação | 1967-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | The Journal of African History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0021-8537 • E-ISSN: 1469-5138 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s002185370000685x |
| OpenAlex | W2139095287 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 18 |
| Referências citadas | 18 |
The accounts of the Difaqane written in all the major histories of South Africa are based on three books which were written over fifty years ago: G. W. Stow, The Native Races of South Africa ; D. F. Ellenberger and J. C. Macgregor, The History of the Bosuto ; and especially the earliest, G. M. Theal, History of South Africa . Certain contradictions exist between the story as told in these accounts and the evidence brought to light by the publication of the journals of Robert Moffat and David Livingstone. The object of this study is to reconstruct the events of the wars from the broadest possible evidence to give a more complete description, and thereby to test the revision implicit in the new information. This revision is required properly to identify the participants in the battles which were observed by Europeans in the western Tswana lands, especially the battle at Dithakong. In the earlier histories all the battles were attributed to the ‘Mantatee’, a name properly applied to one group of Tlokwa ruled at the time by the regentess, MmaNthatisi. Now it is possible to show that these Tlokwa were never in the west, but restricted their migrations to the valley of the Caledon River. Nor can their enemies, the Hlubi of Mpangazita and the Ngwane of Matiwane, be blamed, for they too remained in the east. Rather, the victims of these three bands, the Sotho peoples of the Caledon valley, can be identified as the aggressors among the Tswana beyond the Vaal. Moffat identified the Phuting of Tshane and the Hlakwana of Nkgaraganye. Livingstone demonstrated the role played by Sebetwane and his Fokeng, and Thomas Hodgson implicated Moletsane, the Taung. While many gaps in our information still exist, this reconstruction seems to justify the revision of the accepted account of the Difaqane
Ancient history · Battle · Ethnology · Genealogy · Linguistics · Object (grammar · Tswana · African history and culture studies · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · History · Philosophy · South African History and Culture
The nineteenth-century jihads in West Africa
The forest and the savanna of Central Africa
West Africa in the anti-slave trade era
Tradition and change in Madagascar, 1790–1870
East Africa
Colonial South Africa and its frontiers
Africans overseas, 1790–1870
Freed slave colonies in West Africa
‘Awakening the mother mind’
The Cambridge History of Africa
Identity and interaction
The Great Treks
The Mfecane Debate
Sekonyela and Moshweshwe
Sources of Conflict in Southern Africa, c. 1800–30
Firearms in South-Central Africa
The Mfecane as Alibi
Politics and land in Matatiele 1844-1900
Travels and adventures in Southern Africa
A Narrative of a Visit to the Mauritius and South Africa
Missionary Labours and Scenes in Southern Africa
The Zulu Aftermath
History of the Basuto, Ancient and Modern
A History of Southern Africa
The Cambridge History of the British Empire
History of the Batlokwa of Gaberones (Bechuanaland Protectorate)
Livingstone's Missionary Correspondence
Apprenticeship at Kuruman
An alibi for Mantatisi
| Obras citantes distintas | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,32 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1969 - 2023 (55) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 18 |