Real-World Data
Policy Issues Regarding their Access and Use
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9100752 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Anirban Basu (0000-0001-6620-8320, University of Washington, autor correspondente), Kirsten Axelsen (0000-0003-0711-5428, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY), David C Grabowski (0000-0003-2915-5770, Department of Health Care Policy at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA), David O Meltzer (0000-0003-2790-7393, University of Chicago), Daniel Polsky (0000-0001-8403-9612, Departments of Medicine and Health Care Management at Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PA), David B Ridley (0000-0003-0245-0702, Duke University), Daniel Wiederkehr (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY), Tomas J Philipson (University of Chicago), Tomas Philipson (University of Chicago) |
| Ano | 2016 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Fascículo | 12 |
| Páginas | 1038-1044 |
| Data de publicação | 2016-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editora | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000603 |
| PMID | 27489028 |
| OpenAlex | W2510557686 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 12 |
As real-world data (RWD) in health care begin to cross over to the Big Data realms, a panel of health economists was gathered to establish how well the current US policy environment further the goals of RWD and, if not, what can be done to improve matters. This report summarizes these discussions spanning the current US landscape of RWD availability and usefulness, private versus public development of RWD assets, the current inherent bias in terms of access to RWD, and guiding principles in providing quality assessments of new RWD studies. Three main conclusions emerge: (1) a business case is often required to incentivize investments in RWD assets. However, access restrictions for public data assets have failed to generate a proper market for these data and hence may have led to an underinvestment of public RWDs; (2) Very weak empirical evidence exist on for-profit entities misusing public RWD data entities to further their own agendas, which is the basis for supporting access restrictions of public RWD data; and (3) perhaps developing standardized metrics that could flag misuse of RWDs in an efficient way could help quell some of the fear of sharing public RWD assets with for-profit entities. It is hoped that these discussions and conclusions would pave the way for more rigorous and timely debates on the greater availability and accessibility of RWD assets
Actuarial science · Business · Economics · Microeconomics · Profit (economics) · Public economics · Quality (philosophy) · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Policy and Management · Primary Care and Health Outcomes
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,3 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |