Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Rethinking the Cesarean Rate

How Pregnancy Complications May Affect Interhospital Comparisons

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9101428
AutoresLisa M Korst (0000-0002-0846-7823, University of California, Los Angeles, autor correspondente), Jeffrey A Gornbein, Jeffrey Gornbein (0000-0001-7365-5794), Kimberly D Gregory (0000-0003-2313-9200)
Ano2005
Volume43
Fascículo3
Páginas237-245
Data de publicação2005-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-200503000-00006
PMID15725980
OpenAlexW2014548576
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas15

BACKGROUND: The cesarean rate has served an integral role in the monitoring of obstetrical care, and in 2002, the national rate reached 26.1%, the highest ever reported. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the effect of clinical complications on hospital cesarean rates. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a population-based cohort study. SUBJECTS: All laboring women without a previous cesarean who delivered in California in 1995 as reported through public-use hospital discharge data were included. MEASURES: Women with and without maternal, fetal, or placental complications were compared with respect to cesarean use. Using recursive partitioning algorithms, women with complications were stratified into clinically homogeneous categories, which were analyzed separately with respect to cesarean use. RESULTS: The 443,532 women delivered at 288 hospitals and included 116,170 women (26.2%) in the complicated group (cesarean rate 22.6%); and 327,362 women (73.8%) in the uncomplicated group (cesarean rate 6.7%). At the hospital level, the cesarean rates among the complicated and uncomplicated patients respectively were: median 23.5% (range, 2.2-9.9%); and median 6.5% (range, 1.8-18.2%). Recursive partitioning algorithms suggested 16 distinct clinical categories, with cesarean rates varying from 8.9% for women with asthma to 84.5% for women with an unengaged fetal head. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean rates varied widely across complication types, and complication-specific rates varied widely among hospitals. Although the presence of pregnancy complications upon hospital admission comprised the strongest factor affecting first-time cesarean use among laboring women, the importance and interdependence of these clinical conditions has yet to be incorporated into commonly used models for cesarean rate comparisons

Cesarean delivery · Complication · Maternal morbidity · Obstetrics · Population · Pregnancy · Maternal and fetal healthcare · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Medicine · Neonatal and fetal brain pathology · Surgery

  • Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan

    Open Access•Chao‐Hsiun Tang, Chao-Hsiun Tang et al.•BMC Public Health•2006

  • Association Between Type of Health Insurance and Elective Cesarean Deliveries

    Marco D Huesch•American Journal of Public Health•2011

  • Changes in indications for cesarean delivery

    Kimberly D Gregory, Sally C Curtin et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1998

  • Using ICD-9 codes to identify indications for primary and repeat cesarean sections

    O A Henry, Olsen Henry et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1995

  • Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State

    L Mckenzie, Lara B McKenzie et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1993

Obras citantes distintas2
Citações por ano0,1
Intervalo de citações2006 - 2011 (6)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae