Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Classifying Function for Health Outcome and Quality-of-life Evaluation

Self- Versus Interviewer Modes

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9101565
AutoresJohn P Anderson (University of California San Diego), James W Bush (University of California San Diego), Charles C Berry (University of California San Diego)
Ano1986
Volume24
Fascículo5
Páginas454-470
Data de publicação1986-05-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-198605000-00008
PMID3702504
OpenAlexW2080950589
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas10
Referências citadas7

Validity assessment and the underreporting of dysfunction have been major problems in health-related quality-of-life measurement, including collecting data for analysis by the General Health Policy Model, using the Quality of Well-being scale (QWB). This analysis compares the results of self- versus interviewer modes of measurement and short, direct-answer questions versus probing algorithms in the QWB. The comparisons are made in terms of 1) correlations; 2) aggregate frequencies; 3) individual subject classifications; and 4) the actual state, established using evidence from multiple sources. Despite extremely high correlations between QWB scores from the two modes (greater than 0.98), the lowest interviewer mode sensitivity (0.86) and predictive value dysfunctional (0.91) were substantially superior to the highest self-classification characteristics (0.66 and 0.73). In the populations studied, specificities and predictive values functional were equivalent (greater than 0.94) for the two modes. The probe pattern of the interviewer mode was also less susceptible to false reports of dysfunction. These results are consistent with the underreporting of dysfunction noted by several major investigations of health status measurement. The authors conclude that interviewer-administered instruments using question algorithms are necessary if health-related quality of life is to be measured with sufficient reliability and validity to evaluate major clinical trials and follow-up studies

Economics · Function (biology) · Outcome (game theory) · Quality (philosophy) · Quality of life (healthcare) · Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medicine · Nursing

  • Assessing the quality of life of patients in phases I and II anti-cancer drug trials

    Open Access•Stephen P Mckenna•Social Science & Medicine•2004

  • Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview

    Colleen A Mchorney, Mark Kosinski et al.•Medical Care•1994

  • Interday Reliability of Function Assessment for a Health Status Measure

    John P Anderson, Robert M Kaplan et al.•Medical Care•1989

  • Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.

    Open Access•Fitzpatrick Fitzpatrick, Davey Davey et al.•Health Technology Assessment•1998

  • The Quality of Well-Being scale in asymptomatic HIV-infected patients

    Open Access•R M Kaplan, Thomas L Patterson et al.•Quality of Life Research•1997

  • Comparing survey data on functional disability

    H Susan J Picavet, H S Picavet et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•1996

  • Evidence for decline in disability and improved health among persons aged 55 to 70 years

    Saralyn H Allaire, Michael P LaValley et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1999

  • Comparability of Interview- and Self-Administration of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (Fact-G) in English- and Spanish-Speaking Ambulatory Cancer Patients

    Elizabeth A Hahn, Deepa Rao et al.•Medical Care•2008

  • Using quality of life information to set priorities in health policy

    Open Access•Robert M Kaplan•Social Indicators Research•1994

  • Assessing the quality of life of patients in phase I and II anti-cancer drug trials

    Open Access•Karen Cox•Social Science & Medicine•2003

  • A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

    Open Access•Jacob Cohen•Educational and Psychological…•1960

  • Estimating health program outcomes using a Markov equilibrium analysis of disease development

    James W Bush, Jacek Zaremba•American Journal of Public Health•1971

  • Social indicators for health planning and policy analysis

    Open Access•MiltonM Chen, James W Bush et al.•Policy Sciences•1975

  • Advances in the Measurement of Functional Status

    Anita L Stewart, John E Ware et al.•Medical Care•1981

  • Counterintuitive??? Preferences in Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measurement

    James W Bush, John P Anderson et al.•Medical Care•1982

  • Health Status Index

    Robert M Kaplan, James W Bush et al.•Medical Care•1979

  • Toward an Operational Definition of Health

    Donald L Patrick, James W Bush et al.•Journal of Health and Social…•1973

Obras citantes distintas10
Citações por ano0,27
Intervalo de citações1989 - 2008 (20)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 7
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae