Classifying Function for Health Outcome and Quality-of-life Evaluation
Self- Versus Interviewer Modes
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9101565 |
|---|---|
| Autores | John P Anderson (University of California San Diego), James W Bush (University of California San Diego), Charles C Berry (University of California San Diego) |
| Ano | 1986 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 454-470 |
| Data de publicação | 1986-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editora | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/00005650-198605000-00008 |
| PMID | 3702504 |
| OpenAlex | W2080950589 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 10 |
| Referências citadas | 7 |
Validity assessment and the underreporting of dysfunction have been major problems in health-related quality-of-life measurement, including collecting data for analysis by the General Health Policy Model, using the Quality of Well-being scale (QWB). This analysis compares the results of self- versus interviewer modes of measurement and short, direct-answer questions versus probing algorithms in the QWB. The comparisons are made in terms of 1) correlations; 2) aggregate frequencies; 3) individual subject classifications; and 4) the actual state, established using evidence from multiple sources. Despite extremely high correlations between QWB scores from the two modes (greater than 0.98), the lowest interviewer mode sensitivity (0.86) and predictive value dysfunctional (0.91) were substantially superior to the highest self-classification characteristics (0.66 and 0.73). In the populations studied, specificities and predictive values functional were equivalent (greater than 0.94) for the two modes. The probe pattern of the interviewer mode was also less susceptible to false reports of dysfunction. These results are consistent with the underreporting of dysfunction noted by several major investigations of health status measurement. The authors conclude that interviewer-administered instruments using question algorithms are necessary if health-related quality of life is to be measured with sufficient reliability and validity to evaluate major clinical trials and follow-up studies
Economics · Function (biology) · Outcome (game theory) · Quality (philosophy) · Quality of life (healthcare) · Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medicine · Nursing
Assessing the quality of life of patients in phases I and II anti-cancer drug trials
Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview
Interday Reliability of Function Assessment for a Health Status Measure
Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.
The Quality of Well-Being scale in asymptomatic HIV-infected patients
Comparing survey data on functional disability
Evidence for decline in disability and improved health among persons aged 55 to 70 years
Comparability of Interview- and Self-Administration of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (Fact-G) in English- and Spanish-Speaking Ambulatory Cancer Patients
Using quality of life information to set priorities in health policy
Assessing the quality of life of patients in phase I and II anti-cancer drug trials
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Estimating health program outcomes using a Markov equilibrium analysis of disease development
Social indicators for health planning and policy analysis
Advances in the Measurement of Functional Status
Counterintuitive??? Preferences in Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measurement
Health Status Index
Toward an Operational Definition of Health
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,27 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1989 - 2008 (20) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 7 |