Variations by Specialty in Physician Ratings of the Appropriateness and Necessity of Indications for Procedures

The authors compare the appropriateness ratings and mutual influence of panelists from different specialties rating a comprehensive set of indications for six surgical procedures. Nine-member panels rated each procedure: abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery, carotid endarterectomy, cataract surgery, coronary angiography, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery/percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (common panel). Panelists individually rated the appropriateness of indications at home and then discussed and re-rated the indications during a 2-day meeting. Subsequently, they rated the necessity of those indications scored by the group as appropriate. There were 45 panelists, including specialists (either performers of the procedure or members of a related specialty) and primary care providers, all drawn from nominations by their respective specialty societies. Main outcome measures included: individual panelists' mean ratings over all indications, mean change and conformity scores between rounds of ratings, and the percentage of audited actual procedures rated appropriate or necessary. Performers had the highest mean ratings, followed by physicians in related specialties, trailed by primary care providers. One fifth of all actual procedures were for indications rated appropriate by performers and less than appropriate by primary care providers. At the panel meetings, primary care providers and related specialists showed no greater tendency to be influenced by other panelists than did performers. Multispecialty panels provide more divergent viewpoints than panels composed entirely of performers. This divergence means that fewer actual procedures are deemed performed for appropriate or necessary indications

Carotid arteries · Carotid endarterectomy · Family medicine · MEDLINE · Specialty · Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Medicine · Surgery

• The Internet, Ethics, and False Beliefs in Health Care

  Open Access•Annie Tsay•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2018

  Incluir item

• Delphi study among international expert panel to develop waterpipe-specific health warning labels

  Taghrid Asfar, Michael Schmidt et al.•Tobacco Control•2019

  Incluir item

• Building consensus on a set of ENDS-specific pictorial health warnings

  Taghrid Asfar, Michael Schmidt et al.•Tobacco Control•2024

  Incluir item

• Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.

  Open Access•Murphy Murphy, Black Black et al.•Health Technology Assessment•1998

  Incluir item

• Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators

  Open Access•Rym Boulkedid, Hendy Abdoul et al.•PLoS ONE•2011

  Incluir item

• The appropriateness of use of coronary angiography in Lebanon

  Open Access•Abla M Sibai, Rania A Tohme et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2008

  Incluir item

• Risk, motives, and styles of utilization review

  Open Access•Nathan Wolff, Mark Schlesinger•Social Science & Medicine•1998

  Incluir item

• Reconciling patient and provider priorities for improving the care of critically ill patients

  Open Access•Emily McKenzie, Melissa L Potestio et al.•Health Expectations•2017

  Incluir item

• Reproducibility of Measures of Overuse of Cataract Surgery by Three Physician Panels

  Joanne K Tobacman, Ingrid U Scott et al.•Medical Care•1999

  Incluir item

• Effect of Specialty and Nationality on Panel Judgments of the Appropriateness of Coronary Revascularization

  STEVEN J BERNSTEIN, P Lázaro et al.•Medical Care•2001

  Incluir item

• Hospital Readmissions and Quality of Care

  Joel S Weissman, John Z Ayanian et al.•Medical Care•1999

  Incluir item

• Statistical Approaches in the Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines From Expert Panels

  Vincent Wietlisbach, John-Paul Vader et al.•Medical Care•1999

  Incluir item

• The Effect of Panel Membership and Feedback on Ratings in a Two-Round Delphi Survey

  Stephen Campbell, Stephen M Campbell et al.•Medical Care•1999

  Incluir item

• Appropriateness measurement

  Open Access•Paul Bissell, P Ward et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2000

  Incluir item

• Appropriateness in health care

  Open Access•Stephen Buetow, Stephen A Buetow et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1997

  Incluir item

• Reliability and Validity of Utilization Review Criteria

  Ira Strumwasser, Nitin V Paranjpe et al.•Medical Care•1990

  Incluir item

• Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures

  R E Park, Rohnert Park et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1986

  Incluir item

• Panel Processes for Revising Relative Values of Physician Work

  James P Kahan, Sally C Morton et al.•Medical Care•1994

  Incluir item

• The Influence of Gender on Physician Practice Style

  Klea D Bertakis, L Jay Helms et al.•Medical Care•1995

  Incluir item

• Measuring the Necessity of Medical Procedures

  James P Kahan, STEVEN J BERNSTEIN et al.•Medical Care•1994

  Incluir item