Perceptions of Iowa Family Physicians Regarding Colorectal Cancer Screening
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9102274 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Barcey T Levy (0000-0002-3315-4116, University of Iowa), Mrinalini Joshi (University of Iowa), Yinghui Xu (0000-0002-5088-5092, University of Iowa), Jeanette Daly, Jeanette M Daly (0000-0001-7130-4552, University of Iowa), Paul A James (0000-0002-4361-4657, University of Iowa) |
| Ano | 2008 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Fascículo | 9 |
| Páginas | S103-S108 |
| Data de publicação | 2008-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editora | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31817c6100 |
| PMID | 18725821 |
| OpenAlex | W2020052196 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
| Referências citadas | 42 |
BACKGROUND: Fewer than half of Americans have been screened for colorectal cancer (CRC), a largely preventable disease. METHODS: All physician members (n = 1030) of the Iowa Academy of Family Physicians were mailed a 3-page investigator-developed survey about their attitudes, barriers, and practices regarding CRC screening. RESULTS: The usable response rate was 29%. Forty-three percent practiced in rural settings. Ninety-five percent felt that they were well informed about American Cancer Society guidelines and 90% tried to follow the guidelines. Most doctors (88%) disagreed with the statement that there was "no time to adequately discuss screening," but they would like more time to discuss screening. Only 40% felt their medical records were organized to easily determine screening status, 40% encouraged office staff to participate in screening, and 16% had a written policy regarding CRC screening. Physicians estimated that they recommend screening to 78% of their patients and that 54% of their patients were actually up-to-date. Discussion of CRC screening was strongly dependent on visit type, with physicians estimating that CRC screening is discussed at 11% of acute visits, 42% of chronic visits, and 87% of health maintenance visits. Several office system factors were associated with a recommendation for screening in a multivariable linear regression model (R = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Although nearly all physicians felt that they were well informed about American Cancer Society guidelines and tried to follow guidelines for CRC screening, few had office systems to facilitate screening. Physicians would like more time to discuss screening. Office systems likely have the most potential to improve CRC screening among patients attending primary care practices
Cancer · Cancer screening · Colonoscopy · Colorectal cancer · Colorectal cancer screening · Family medicine · MEDLINE · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Internal Medicine · Medicine
Risk assessment and clinical decision making for colorectal cancer screening
System Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers
Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Through Research in Primary Care Settings
Evaluating Approaches to Increase Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening
Predicting Racial Disparities in Nursing Home Admission
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,28 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2008 - 2020 (13) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |