Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Structure and Reliability of Ware’s Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III

Patients’ Satisfaction With Oncological Care in the Netherlands

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9102893
AutoresMariët Hagedoorn (0000-0003-3444-3662, University of Groningen, autor correspondente), Sabine G Uijl (0000-0001-6511-3266, University of Groningen, autor correspondente), Eric Van Sonderen (University of Groningen, autor correspondente), Adelita V Ranchor (0000-0001-7048-3771, University of Groningen, autor correspondente), Brigit M F Grol, Brigit Grol (Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation), Renée Otter, Boudien Krol (University of Groningen, autor correspondente), Wim Van Den Heuvel (Adelante), R Sanderman (0000-0002-0823-1159, University of Groningen, autor correspondente)
Ano2003
Volume41
Fascículo2
Páginas254-263
Data de publicação2003-02-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/01.mlr.0000044904.70286.b4
PMID12555053
OpenAlexW1983382523
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas38

BACKGROUND: The present study examined the structure and reliability of the Dutch version of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III (PSQ III). The PSQ III was designed to measure technical competence, interpersonal manner, communication, time spent with doctor, financial aspects, and access to care. In the Dutch version, the financial items were left aside because these are not appropriate for the Dutch socialized system. OBJECTIVES: The main objectives were to assess response bias, the number of dimensions needed to describe the PSQ III items, and the reliability of the scales. In addition, distribution characteristics were examined and norm scores to interpret satisfaction scores in an oncological setting were presented. RESEARCH DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey study.SUBJECTS The study was comprised of 1594 cancer patients from eight hospitals. MEASURES: The Dutch version of the PSQ III. RESULTS: Approximately 14% of the respondents were found to demonstrate considerable response bias. Confirmative factor analyses were performed to test three theoretical models with a varying number of dimensions among those participants who did not demonstrate response bias. The original structure did not fit the data well, but support was found for a three-factor model (with interpersonal manner, communication, and time spent with doctor loading on one factor instead of separate factors) and a one-dimensional model. CONCLUSIONS: The PSQ III seems to be an appropriate measure of cancer patients' satisfaction, with the note that the number of dimensions may vary for different patient groups and/or care settings and that it is important to be aware of response bias

Competence (human resources) · Interpersonal communication · Patient satisfaction · Reliability (semiconductor) · Response bias · Cancer survivorship and care · Clinical Psychology · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Patient ethnicity

    Bejoy Thomas, Bejoy C Thomas et al.•Ethnicity and Health•2009

  • Likert Scales Require Validation before Application - Another Cautionary Tale

    Open Access•Catherine Michalopoulou•Bulletin of Sociological…•2017

  • Patient Satisfaction and Use of Veterans Affairs Versus Non-Veterans Affairs Healthcare Services by Veterans

    Kevin T Stroupe, Denise M Hynes et al.•Medical Care•2005

  • Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care

    Open Access•John E Ware, Mary K Snyder et al.•Evaluation and Program Planning•1983

  • Patient views on quality care in general practice

    Open Access•J Rees Lewis, Jessica Lewis•Social Science & Medicine•1994

  • Patient satisfaction

    Open Access•John Sitzia, Neil Wood•Social Science & Medicine•1997

  • The Hierarchical Structure of Geriatric Patient Satisfaction

    Arthur G Cryns, Robert C Nichols et al.•Medical Care•1989

  • Effects of Acquiescent Response Set on Patient Satisfaction Ratings

    John E Ware•Medical Care•1978

  • An Evaluation of the Impact of Nonresponse Bias on Patient Satisfaction Surveys

    Rebecca J Lasek, William M Barkley et al.•Medical Care•1997

  • Validation of a Patient Satisfaction Scale

    Barbara S Hulka, Stephen J Zyzanski•Medical Care•1982

  • Development of Scales to Measure Satisfaction and Preferences Regarding Long-Term and Terminal Care

    Jane McCusker•Medical Care•1984

  • A Comparative Study of Seven Measures of Patient Satisfaction

    Caroline K Ross, Colette A Steward et al.•Medical Care•1995

  • Patient Suffering and Patient Satisfaction Among the Chronically Ill

    Lawrence S Linn, Sheldon Greenfield•Medical Care•1982

  • Methods For Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Specific Medical Encounters

    John E Ware, Ron D Hays•Medical Care•1988

  • Scale for the Measurement of Attitudes toward Physicians and Primary Medical Care

    Barbara S Hulka, Stephen J Zyzanski et al.•Medical Care•1970

  • Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Patient Satisfaction with Pharmacy Services

    Linda D MacKeigan, Linda MacKeigan et al.•Medical Care•1989

  • The Importance of Patient Preferences in the Measurement of Health Care Satisfaction

    Caroline K Ross, Colette A Steward et al.•Medical Care•1993

  • Improving the Assessment of (In)patients??? Satisfaction With Hospital Care

    A A Jolijn Hendriks, Marjon R Vrielink et al.•Medical Care•2001

  • Scale for the Measurement of "Satisfaction" with Medical Care

    Stephen J Zyzanski, Barbara S Hulka et al.•Medical Care•1974

  • Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care

    Open Access•Phi Linh Nguyen Thi, Phi‐linh Nguyen‐thi et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2002

  • Validating a satisfaction questionnaire using multiple approaches

    Open Access•Jean-François Etter, Thomas V Perneger et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1997

  • Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care

    Open Access•Judith A Hall, Michael C Dornan•Social Science & Medicine•1988

  • Predictors of patient satisfaction

    Open Access•Jeffrey L Jackson, Judith Chamberlin et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2001

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano0,14
Intervalo de citações2005 - 2017 (13)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae