Using Self-reports or Claims to Assess Disease Prevalence
It’s Complicated
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9103839 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Patricia St Clair (University of Southern California), Étienne Gaudette (0000-0003-0359-2083, University of Southern California), Henu Zhao (0000-0001-6797-8802, University of Southern California), Bryan Tysinger (0000-0002-8497-3664, University of Southern California), Roxanna Seyedin (0000-0001-6729-5120, University of Southern California), Dana P Goldman (0000-0001-8498-6396, University of Southern California) |
| Ano | 2017 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Fascículo | 8 |
| Páginas | 782-788 |
| Data de publicação | 2017-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editora | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000753 |
| PMID | 28617703 |
| OpenAlex | W2626892653 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
| Referências citadas | 20 |
BACKGROUND: Two common ways of measuring disease prevalence include: (1) using self-reported disease diagnosis from survey responses; and (2) using disease-specific diagnosis codes found in administrative data. Because they do not suffer from self-report biases, claims are often assumed to be more objective. However, it is not clear that claims always produce better prevalence estimates. OBJECTIVE: Conduct an assessment of discrepancies between self-report and claims-based measures for 2 diseases in the US elderly to investigate definition, selection, and measurement error issues which may help explain divergence between claims and self-report estimates of prevalence. DATA: Self-reported data from 3 sources are included: the Health and Retirement Study, the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Claims-based disease measurements are provided from Medicare claims linked to Health and Retirement Study and Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey participants, comprehensive claims data from a 20% random sample of Medicare enrollees, and private health insurance claims from Humana Inc. METHODS: Prevalence of diagnosed disease in the US elderly are computed and compared across sources. Two medical conditions are considered: diabetes and heart attack. RESULTS: Comparisons of diagnosed diabetes and heart attack prevalence show similar trends by source, but claims differ from self-reports with regard to levels. Selection into insurance plans, disease definitions, and the reference period used by algorithms are identified as sources contributing to differences. CONCLUSIONS: Claims and self-reports both have strengths and weaknesses, which researchers need to consider when interpreting estimates of prevalence from these 2 sources
Actuarial science · Beneficiary · Disease · Environmental health · Family medicine · Health and Retirement Study · National Health Interview Survey · Pathology · Population · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Health disparities and outcomes · Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention · Medicine · Gerontology
Racial/Ethnic and Educational Disparities in the Impact of Diabetes on Population Health Among the U.S.-Born Population
Sex, Race, and Age Differences in Prevalence of Dementia in Medicare Claims and Survey Data
Consistency between self-reported disease diagnosis and clinical assessment and under-reporting for chronic conditions
Diagnostic validity of millon clinical multiaxial inventory-IV (MCMI-IV)
Validade e Concordância do registro em prontuário do uso de serviços da Rede de Atenção à Saúde por idosos
Accuracy of Medicare Expenditures in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Propensity to consent to data linkage
Hospital Episodes and Physician Visits
Data Sources for Measuring Comorbidity
The Concordance of Survey Reports and Medicare Claims in a Nationally Representative Longitudinal Cohort of Older Adults
The Validity of Self-reported Physician Utilization Measures
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,83 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |