Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Respondent Selection by Mail

Obtaining Probability Samples of Health Plan Enrollees

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9104092
AutoresPatricia M Gallagher (0000-0001-9844-8978, University of Massachusetts Boston, autor correspondente), Floyd Jackson Fowler (0000-0001-5889-6362, University of Massachusetts Boston), Vickie L Stringfellow (0000-0002-9474-0100, University of Massachusetts Boston)
Ano1999
Volume37
FascículoSUPPLEMENT
PáginasMS50-MS58
Data de publicação1999-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-199903001-00006
PMID10098559
OpenAlexW2023473091
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas5

OBJECTIVES: This study was done to assess the feasibility of respondent selection by mail to obtain random samples of both child and adult enrollees of health plans when only subscriber contact information is available. METHODS: The subjects were enrollees of health plans covered under the policies of employees of the State of Washington. Subscribers were eligible for inclusion in the study samples if they had been enrolled for at least 6 months and, depending on the test, had at least one child and/or a spouse enrolled under their policy. Subjects were randomly assigned to six groups: three approaches for sampling children, two approaches for sampling adults, and one test of parents' willingness to return a questionnaire about themselves. Child selection protocols involved asking respondents to complete either a child-only or a dual questionnaire, asking them to follow a decision rule to choose a sample person, and collecting data in two phases, asking respondents to return material twice. RESULTS: Results indicated that asking subscribers to select an adult respondent by mail was not a success. At least given the procedures we used, adults did not demonstrate good compliance with the respondent selection process offered them. In contrast, parents proved willing to follow a more complicated child selection rule and to do it nearly perfectly. CONCLUSIONS: Parents will follow a decision rule to select an eligible child, but requiring this additional respondent selection step may be associated with a slightly decreased response rate. Asking parents to return materials twice is feasible, but it is too cumbersome a procedure to be practical. It is possible to collect data about both an adult and a child using a dual instrument; however, the increase in information is tempered by a decrease in response rates

Data science · Machine learning · Political science · Respondent · Selection (genetic algorithm) · Computer Science · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

  • The Impact of Having Parents Report About Both Their Own and Their Children's Experiences With Health Insurance Plans

    James A Shaul, Floyd Jackson Fowler et al.•Medical Care•1999

  • Assessing Within-Household Selection Methods in Household Mail Surveys

    Kristen Olson, Mathew Stange et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2014

  • Accuracy of Within-household Selection in Web and Mail Surveys of the General Population

    Open Access•K Olson, Jolene D Smyth•CAM•2014

  • Introduction to Survey Sampling

    Graham Kalton•Introduction to Survey Sampling•1983

  • Mail and Telephone Surveys

    Earl Babbie, Don A Dillman•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1982

  • The Impact of Having Parents Report About Both Their Own and Their Children's Experiences With Health Insurance Plans

    James A Shaul, Floyd Jackson Fowler et al.•Medical Care•1999

  • Handbook of Survey Research

    Stanley Presser, Peter H Rossi et al.•Social Forces•1985

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano0,11
Intervalo de citações1999 - 2014 (16)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae