Systemwide Provider Performance in a Medicaid Program

OBJECTIVES: This study illustrates how claims data can be applied to examine cost and clinical performance of providers in the Medicaid program. METHODS: The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of Medicaid beneficiaries in Maryland with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and asthma treated on an ambulatory basis by hospital-based outpatient departments, physician office-based providers, and community health centers. The study year was July 1987 to June 1988. The authors defined the cost performance (high, medium, or low) of providers in the management of each of the three chronic illnesses, both before and after casemix adjustment, using a classification system based on ambulatory diagnoses (ambulatory care groups). The authors constructed claims-based clinical performance indicators for each of the three conditions. These included the number of patients admitted to acute-care hospitals for any and specific (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and asthma) causes, the number of patients without a follow-up visit within 30 days of being discharged from the hospital, and the number of patients with consecutive emergency room visits during the study period. RESULTS: The ambulatory care group casemix classification system explained 23%, 33%, and 36% of the variation in total payments for patients with hypertension, diabetes, and asthma, respectively. Without adjustment for casemix, 35% to 50% of providers would be misclassified regarding their cost performance. Forty-one (19.4%) of 211 providers who treated all three illnesses were in the same cost group for all three illnesses and 95 (43%) of 223 providers who treated two of the three illnesses were in the same cost group for both illnesses. Among office-based physicians, for all three chronic illnesses, high-cost providers had more admissions (P 0.05) difference in the clinical performance indicators between high-cost and low-cost hospital outpatient department providers of primary care for hypertensive and diabetic Medicaid beneficiaries. For the other clinical performance indicators, the results were not consistent across the three illnesses or across the different types of providers. CONCLUSIONS: Without adjustments for casemix, a large number of providers are misclassified regarding to cost performance. In addition, most providers are not equally efficient in managing different chronic illnesses. Provider cost performance is not associated consistently with clinical performance, although severity differences not captured by the casemix adjustment may account for these observations. These measurement methods and relationships between provider performance measures may be useful to state Medicaid programs that seek to contain costs, enhance coordination of care, and improve health

Health care · Medicaid · MEDLINE · Political science · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Healthcare Policy and Management · Primary Care and Health Outcomes

• A Quantitative Observational Study of Physician Influence on Hospital Costs

  Open Access•Herbert Wong, Zeynal Karaca et al.•INQUIRY The Journal of Health…•2018

  Incluir item

• Ambulatory Care Sensitive Hospitalization Rates in the Aged Medicare Population in Utah, 1990 to 1994

  Open Access•Michael Silver, Michael P Silver et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•1997

  Incluir item

• Decreased Attendance at Cystic Fibrosis Centers by Children Covered by Managed Care Insurance

  Ian Nathanson, Gabriela Ramírez-Garnica et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2005

  Incluir item

• Developing a Reliable, Valid, and Feasible Plan for Quality-of-Care Measurement for Cancer

  Katherine L Kahn, Jennifer L Malin et al.•Medical Care•2002

  Incluir item

• Predicting Resource Utilization in a Veterans Health Administration Primary Care Population

  Terry L Wahls, Mitchell J Barnett et al.•Medical Care•2004

  Incluir item

• Application of the Ambulatory Care Groups in the Primary Care of a European National Health Care System

  Juan F Orueta, Josefina Lopez-De-Munain et al.•Medical Care•1999

  Incluir item

• Performance of the ACG Case-Mix System in Two Canadian Provinces

  Robert J Reid, Leonard Macwilliam et al.•Medical Care•2001

  Incluir item

• Analysis of Affordable Health Care

  Tsan-Yao Huang, Tsan‐Yao Huang et al.•Medical Care•2022

  Incluir item

• Lapses in Medicaid Coverage

  Allyson G Hall, Jeffrey S Harman et al.•Medical Care•2008

  Incluir item

• Patient Race and Ethnicity in Primary Care Management of Child Behavior Problems

  Kelly J Kelleher, Cathy D Moore et al.•Medical Care•1999

  Incluir item

• Ambulatory Care Sensitive Hospitalizations and Emergency Visits

  Marilyn Falik, Jacob Needleman et al.•Medical Care•2001

  Incluir item

• Characteristics of Patients with a Regular Source of Care

  Open Access•Verena H Menec, Verena Menec et al.•Canadian Journal of Public Health•2001

  Incluir item

• What is Most Important

  Open Access•L L Roos, Brett Hiebert et al.•Social Indicators Research•2013

  Incluir item

• Rates of Avoidable Hospitalization by Insurance Status in Massachusetts and Maryland

  Joel S Weissman•JAMA•1992

  Incluir item

• Development and Application of a Population-Oriented Measure of Ambulatory Care Case-Mix

  Jonathan P Weiner, Barbara Starfield et al.•Medical Care•1991

  Incluir item