Impact of Ongoing Primary Care Intervention on Long Term Outcomes In Uninsured and Insured Patients With Depression
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9104500 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jeffrey L Smith (0000-0001-7766-3118, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, autor correspondente), Kathryn Rost (autor correspondente), Kathryn M Rost, Paul A Nutting (autor correspondente), Carl E Elliott (autor correspondente), L Miriam Dickinson (0000-0001-8302-809X) |
| Ano | 2002 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Fascículo | 12 |
| Páginas | 1210-1222 |
| Data de publicação | 2002-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editora | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/00005650-200212000-00008 |
| PMID | 12458303 |
| OpenAlex | W2332548037 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 57 |
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the differential impact of an ongoing primary care depression intervention on uninsured and insured patients' outcomes 12, 18, and 24 months following baseline. RESEARCH DESIGN: Quasi-experimental longitudinal study of insured and uninsured patients with depression receiving treatment from 12 practices randomized to enhanced (intervention) and usual care study conditions. SUBJECTS: In 1996 to 1997, 383 nonelderly patients with depression (290 insured, 93 uninsured) were enrolled and followed for 24 months. MEASURES: Mental-health-related-quality-of-life (MHQOL) was assessed at each follow-up using the SF-36 Mental Component Summary scale. Presence of major depressive episode was assessed at 24-month follow-up with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. RESULTS: Uninsured enhanced-care patients had significantly better MHQOL outcomes at 24 months than uninsured usual care patients (40.6 vs. 32.7, respectively; P = 0.01). The intervention had no significant impact on insured patients' MHQOL outcomes at any follow-up interval. Among patients receiving usual care, the uninsured compared with the insured had significantly poorer MHQOL outcomes (32.7 vs. 40.7, respectively; P = 0.002) and significantly increased probability of experiencing a major depressive episode (40.6% vs. 19.8%, respectively; P = 0.04) at 24 months. No such disparities were observed between uninsured and insured patients receiving enhanced care. CONCLUSIONS: The ongoing intervention significantly improved quality-of-life outcomes in uninsured patients at 24 months. If the intervention's impact on MHQOL can be confirmed and proved cost-effective in larger uninsured patient populations, clinicians serving the uninsured may want to consider implementing the study's intervention
Confidence interval · Depression (economics) · Intervention (counseling) · Mental health · Psychiatry · Quality of life (healthcare) · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Unmet Health Needs of Uninsured Adults in the United States
Impact of Disseminating Quality Improvement Programs for Depression in Managed Primary Care
The CES-D Scale
Hierarchical linear models
A Primary Care Intervention for Depression
Healthy People 2010
Access to care for the uninsured
Achieving Guidelines for the Treatment of Depression in Primary Care
Resolving Disparities in Antidepressant Treatment and Quality-of-Life Outcomes Between Uninsured and Insured Primary Care Patients With Depression
Adequacy and Duration of Antidepressant Treatment in Primary Care
What Information Do Consumers Want and How Will They Use It
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,09 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2004 - 2006 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |