Validity and Interpretation of Preference-Based Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9105041 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Leslie Lenert (0000-0002-9680-5094, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, autor correspondente), Robert M Kaplan (0000-0003-0229-0200) |
| Ano | 2000 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Fascículo | 9 Suppl |
| Páginas | II-138-II-150 |
| Data de publicação | 2000-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editora | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00021 |
| PMID | 10982099 |
| OpenAlex | W1973876672 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 23 |
| Referências citadas | 56 |
Utilities are numeric measurements that reflect an individual's beliefs about the desirableness of a health condition, willingness to take risks to gain health benefits, and preferences for time. This report discusses the approaches to assess and compare the validity of methods used to assign utilities for cost-utility analysis. Threats to validity include construct underrepresentation and construct-irrelevant variance. Construct underrepresentation occurs when a stimulus presented to a judge fails to fully represent the depth and complexity of information required in actual judgments. Construct-irrelevant variation occurs when factors irrelevant to preferences influence measurements of utilities. Among several factors that cause construct-irrelevant variation are cognitive abilities, numeracy skills, emotions and prejudices, and the elicitation procedure. Commonly used elicitation methods (visual-analog scales, time tradeoff, and standard gamble) capture different facets of utilities (desirableness of states, time preferences, and risk attitude) to different degrees. The validity of an elicitation protocol depends (1) on the degree to which its scaling method captures the relevant facets of utility and (2) on the degree to which measurements are influenced by construct-irrelevant variation. Discrete-state health index models provide an alternative to direct elicitation of utilities and work by attaching fixed preference weights to observable health states. The creation of discrete-state models with current technologies requires the adoption of strong assumptions about the scaling properties of utilities. Future research must refine methods of eliciting utilities and identify sources of construct-irrelevant variability that reduce the validity of utility assessments. Because of the impact of variation in techniques on measurements, we do not recommend the combination of utilities elicited with different protocols in cost-utility analysis and do not recommend the display of cost-utility ratios from different studies in comparison or "league" tables
Cognitive psychology · Construct (python library) · Construct validity · Econometrics · Economics · Explained variation · External validity · Machine learning · Preference · Preference elicitation · Psychometrics · Statistics · Variance (accounting) · Variation (astronomy) · Computer Science · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Policy and Management · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology
Validação da versão brasileira do questionário genérico de qualidade de vida short-form 6 dimensions (SF-6D Brasil)
Prevalence and Losses in Quality-Adjusted Life Years of Child Health Conditions
Evidence on the construct validity of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 in patients with chronic kidney disease
Influenced from the start
Validity and Responsiveness of Generic Preference-based HRQOL Instruments in Chronic Epilepsy
Marker states and a health state prompt provide modest improvements in the reliability and validity of the standard gamble and rating scale in prostate cancer patients
Neck pain patients’ preference scores for their current health
Utilities For Prostate Cancer Health States in Men Aged 60 and Older
Variation in Treatment Preferences and Care Goals Among Older Patients With Diabetes and Their Physicians
A National Catalog of Preference-Based Scores for Chronic Conditions in the United States
Health Values of Patients Coinfected With HIV/Hepatitis C
Valuations of EQ-5D Health States
Eliciting Utilities Using Functional Methodology
Outcomes of social care for adults
Literacy and health outcomes
Response to Lenert and Kaplan
Response to Lenert and Kaplan
Health Outcomes Methodology Symposium
Response to Lenert and Kaplan
Use of Willingness to Pay to Study Values for Pharmacotherapies for Migraine Headache
Health Utility Ratings for a Spectrum of Alcohol-Related Health States
The new subjective medicine
Diagnostic and Treatment Decisions in US Healthcare
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
Methodology for measuring health-state preferences—II
The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public
The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography
On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies
Toward a Broader View of Values in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health
Methods for assessing quality of life in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (Cast)
The effect of assessment method and respondent population on utilities elicited for Gaucher Disease
Value Judgment in the Oregon Medicaid Experiment
Multiattribute Utility Function for a Comprehensive Health Status Classification System
Do Category Rating Scales Produce Biased Preference Weights for a Health Index
Assessing the Performance of Utility Techniques in the Absence of a Gold Standard
Describing Health States
Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States
Measurement of the Validity of Utility Elicitations Performed by Computerized Interview
Assessing Patients?? Utilities
Methodological Issues of Patient Utility Measurement Experience From Two Clinical Trials
What Information Do Consumers Want and How Will They Use It
Associations Between Health Status and Utilities Implications for Policy
Weights for Scoring the Quality of Well-being Instrument Among Rheumatoid Arthritics
Cost utility analysis
Valuing health status using VAS and TTO
Inconsistency and health state valuations
| Obras citantes distintas | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,88 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2000 - 2016 (17) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 11 |