Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Validity and Interpretation of Preference-Based Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9105041
AutoresLeslie Lenert (0000-0002-9680-5094, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, autor correspondente), Robert M Kaplan (0000-0003-0229-0200)
Ano2000
Volume38
Fascículo9 Suppl
PáginasII-138-II-150
Data de publicação2000-09-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-200009002-00021
PMID10982099
OpenAlexW1973876672
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas23
Referências citadas56

Utilities are numeric measurements that reflect an individual's beliefs about the desirableness of a health condition, willingness to take risks to gain health benefits, and preferences for time. This report discusses the approaches to assess and compare the validity of methods used to assign utilities for cost-utility analysis. Threats to validity include construct underrepresentation and construct-irrelevant variance. Construct underrepresentation occurs when a stimulus presented to a judge fails to fully represent the depth and complexity of information required in actual judgments. Construct-irrelevant variation occurs when factors irrelevant to preferences influence measurements of utilities. Among several factors that cause construct-irrelevant variation are cognitive abilities, numeracy skills, emotions and prejudices, and the elicitation procedure. Commonly used elicitation methods (visual-analog scales, time tradeoff, and standard gamble) capture different facets of utilities (desirableness of states, time preferences, and risk attitude) to different degrees. The validity of an elicitation protocol depends (1) on the degree to which its scaling method captures the relevant facets of utility and (2) on the degree to which measurements are influenced by construct-irrelevant variation. Discrete-state health index models provide an alternative to direct elicitation of utilities and work by attaching fixed preference weights to observable health states. The creation of discrete-state models with current technologies requires the adoption of strong assumptions about the scaling properties of utilities. Future research must refine methods of eliciting utilities and identify sources of construct-irrelevant variability that reduce the validity of utility assessments. Because of the impact of variation in techniques on measurements, we do not recommend the combination of utilities elicited with different protocols in cost-utility analysis and do not recommend the display of cost-utility ratios from different studies in comparison or "league" tables

Cognitive psychology · Construct (python library) · Construct validity · Econometrics · Economics · Explained variation · External validity · Machine learning · Preference · Preference elicitation · Psychometrics · Statistics · Variance (accounting) · Variation (astronomy) · Computer Science · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Policy and Management · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Validação da versão brasileira do questionário genérico de qualidade de vida short-form 6 dimensions (SF-6D Brasil)

    Open Access•Alessandro Gonçalves Campolina, Adriana Bruscato Bortoluzzo et al.•Ciência & Saúde Coletiva•2011

  • Prevalence and Losses in Quality-Adjusted Life Years of Child Health Conditions

    Open Access•Brandon M Craig, John D Hartman et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2015

  • Evidence on the construct validity of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 in patients with chronic kidney disease

    Open Access•Sara N Davison, Gian S Jhangri et al.•Quality of Life Research•2008

  • Influenced from the start

    Open Access•Liv Ariane Augestad, Knut Stavem et al.•Quality of Life Research•2016

  • Validity and Responsiveness of Generic Preference-based HRQOL Instruments in Chronic Epilepsy

    Open Access•John T Langfitt, Barbara G Vickrey et al.•Quality of Life Research•2006

  • Marker states and a health state prompt provide modest improvements in the reliability and validity of the standard gamble and rating scale in prostate cancer patients

    Open Access•Karen E Bremner, George Tomlinson et al.•Quality of Life Research•2007

  • Neck pain patients’ preference scores for their current health

    Open Access•Gabrielle van der Velde, Sheilah Hogg-Johnson et al.•Quality of Life Research•2010

  • Utilities For Prostate Cancer Health States in Men Aged 60 and Older

    Susan T Stewart, Leslie Lenert et al.•Medical Care•2005

  • Variation in Treatment Preferences and Care Goals Among Older Patients With Diabetes and Their Physicians

    Mong-Hwa Chin, Marshall H Chin et al.•Medical Care•2008

  • A National Catalog of Preference-Based Scores for Chronic Conditions in the United States

    Patrick W Sullivan, William F Lawrence et al.•Medical Care•2005

  • Health Values of Patients Coinfected With HIV/Hepatitis C

    Joseph M Mrus, Joseph Mrus et al.•Medical Care•2006

  • Valuations of EQ-5D Health States

    Jeffrey Johnson, Jeffrey A Johnson et al.•Medical Care•2005

  • Eliciting Utilities Using Functional Methodology

    Open Access•Alexandra Gamelin, Maria Teresa Muñoz Sastre et al.•Quality of Life Research•2006

  • Outcomes of social care for adults

    Open Access•Ann Netten, Pery Burge et al.•Health Technology Assessment•2012

  • Literacy and health outcomes

    Darren A Dewalt, Nancy D Berkman et al.•Journal of General Internal…•2004

  • Response to Lenert and Kaplan

    Joel Tsevat•Medical Care•2000

  • Response to Lenert and Kaplan

    David Feeny•Medical Care•2000

  • Health Outcomes Methodology Symposium

    Kathleen N Lohr•Medical Care•2000

  • Response to Lenert and Kaplan

    Robert F Nease•Medical Care•2000

  • Use of Willingness to Pay to Study Values for Pharmacotherapies for Migraine Headache

    Leslie A Lenert, Leslie Lenert•Medical Care•2003

  • Health Utility Ratings for a Spectrum of Alcohol-Related Health States

    Kevin L Kraemer, Mark S Roberts et al.•Medical Care•2005

  • The new subjective medicine

    Open Access•Mark D Sullivan, Mark Sullivan•Social Science & Medicine•2003

  • Diagnostic and Treatment Decisions in US Healthcare

    Open Access•Robert M Kaplan, Theodore G Ganiats et al.•Journal of Health Psychology•2004

  • Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine

    Marthe R Gold, Joanna E Siegel et al.•Cost-effectiveness in health and…•1996

  • Methodology for measuring health-state preferences—II

    Open Access•Debra G Froberg, Robert L Kane•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•1989

  • The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public

    Open Access•David L Sackett, George W Torrance•Journal of Chronic Diseases•1978

  • The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography

    Open Access•Lisa M Schwartz, Steven Woloshin et al.•Annals of Internal Medicine•1997

  • On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies

    Barbara J Mcneil, Stephen G Pauker et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•1982

  • Toward a Broader View of Values in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health

    Paul T Menzel, Paul Menzel et al.•The Hastings Center Report•1999

  • Methods for assessing quality of life in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (Cast)

    Open Access•Ingela Wiklund, Larry Gorkin et al.•Quality of Life Research•1992

  • The effect of assessment method and respondent population on utilities elicited for Gaucher Disease

    Open Access•Ann E Clarke, M K Goldstein et al.•Quality of Life Research•1997

  • Value Judgment in the Oregon Medicaid Experiment

    Robert M Kaplan•Medical Care•1994

  • Multiattribute Utility Function for a Comprehensive Health Status Classification System

    George W Torrance, David H Feeny et al.•Medical Care•1996

  • Do Category Rating Scales Produce Biased Preference Weights for a Health Index

    Robert M Kaplan, John Ernst et al.•Medical Care•1983

  • Assessing the Performance of Utility Techniques in the Absence of a Gold Standard

    R Brian Giesler, Carol M Ashton et al.•Medical Care•1999

  • Describing Health States

    Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary A Llewellyn‐Thomas et al.•Medical Care•1984

  • Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States

    Paul Dolan•Medical Care•1997

  • Measurement of the Validity of Utility Elicitations Performed by Computerized Interview

    L A Lenert, Leslie Lenert et al.•Medical Care•1997

  • Assessing Patients?? Utilities

    Albert G Mulley•Medical Care•1989

  • Methodological Issues of Patient Utility Measurement Experience From Two Clinical Trials

    MAUREEN MAUREEN, RUTTEN-VAN MÖLKEN et al.•Medical Care•1995

  • What Information Do Consumers Want and How Will They Use It

    John E Ware•Medical Care•1995

  • Associations Between Health Status and Utilities Implications for Policy

    Leslie A Lenert, Leslie Lenert et al.•Medical Care•1999

  • Weights for Scoring the Quality of Well-being Instrument Among Rheumatoid Arthritics

    Donald J Balaban, Philip C Sagi et al.•Medical Care•1986

  • Cost utility analysis

    Open Access•Jeff Richardson•Social Science & Medicine•1994

  • Valuing health status using VAS and TTO

    Open Access•Angela Robinson, Paul Dolan et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1997

  • Inconsistency and health state valuations

    Open Access•Paul Dolan, Paul Kind•Social Science & Medicine•1996

Obras citantes distintas23
Citações por ano0,88
Intervalo de citações2000 - 2016 (17)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 11
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae