Is Bigger Always Better? A Nationwide Study of Hip Fracture Unit Volume, 30-Day Mortality, Quality of In-Hospital Care, and Length of Hospital Stay
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9105090 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Pia Kjær Kristensen (0000-0001-5473-9386, Regional Hospital Horsens, autor correspondente), Theis Muncholm Thillemann (0000-0003-1240-4427, Regional Hospital Horsens, autor correspondente), Søren Paaske Johnsen (0000-0002-2787-0271, Aarhus University Hospital) |
| Ano | 2014 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Fascículo | 12 |
| Páginas | 1023-1029 |
| Data de publicação | 2014-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Editora | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000234 |
| PMID | 25226544 |
| OpenAlex | W2009108990 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 24 |
BACKGROUND: Higher patient volume has been linked with better clinical outcomes for a range of surgical procedures; however, little is known about the impact of volume on quality of care and clinical outcome among patients with hip fracture. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between hip fracture patient volume and 30-day mortality, quality of in-hospital care, time to surgery, and length of hospital stay, respectively. DESIGN: Population-based follow-up study. SUBJECTS: Using prospectively collected data from the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry, we identified 12,065 patients 65 years and older who were admitted with a hip fracture between March 1, 2010 and November 30, 2011. MEASURES: Patient volume was divided into 3 groups; ≤ 151 hip fracture admissions per year, 152-350, and ≥ 351 admissions per year based on the distribution of the hospitals and to ensure a reasonable proportion of hospitals in each category. Data were analyzed using regression techniques while controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: Admission to high-volume units was associated with higher 30-day mortality [adjusted odds ratio (OR)=1.37 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-1.64)] and a longer length of hospital stay (adjusted relative time=1.25 (95% CI, 1.02-1.52)]. Furthermore, patients had lower odds for being mobilized within 24 hours postoperatively and for receiving basic mobility assessment and a postdischarge rehabilitation program. Time to surgery was nonsignificantly increased [adjusted relative time=1.25 (95% CI, 0.99-1.58)]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted to high-volume hip fracture units had higher mortality rates, received a lower quality of in-hospital care, and had longer length of hospital stay
Hip fracture · Medical emergency · Osteoporosis · Quality (philosophy) · Unit (ring theory) · Volume (thermodynamics) · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Emergency Medicine · Hip and Femur Fractures · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Psychology · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature
The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology
How to measure comorbiditya critical review of available methods
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies
Does Practice Make Perfect
Hospital Volume and Patient Outcomes
Does Practice Make Perfect
Selecting Categories of Patients for Regionalization
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2016 - 2021 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |