Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Is Bigger Always Better? A Nationwide Study of Hip Fracture Unit Volume, 30-Day Mortality, Quality of In-Hospital Care, and Length of Hospital Stay

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9105090
AutoresPia Kjær Kristensen (0000-0001-5473-9386, Regional Hospital Horsens, autor correspondente), Theis Muncholm Thillemann (0000-0003-1240-4427, Regional Hospital Horsens, autor correspondente), Søren Paaske Johnsen (0000-0002-2787-0271, Aarhus University Hospital)
Ano2014
Volume52
Fascículo12
Páginas1023-1029
Data de publicação2014-12-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
EditoraOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/mlr.0000000000000234
PMID25226544
OpenAlexW2009108990
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas24

BACKGROUND: Higher patient volume has been linked with better clinical outcomes for a range of surgical procedures; however, little is known about the impact of volume on quality of care and clinical outcome among patients with hip fracture. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between hip fracture patient volume and 30-day mortality, quality of in-hospital care, time to surgery, and length of hospital stay, respectively. DESIGN: Population-based follow-up study. SUBJECTS: Using prospectively collected data from the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry, we identified 12,065 patients 65 years and older who were admitted with a hip fracture between March 1, 2010 and November 30, 2011. MEASURES: Patient volume was divided into 3 groups; ≤ 151 hip fracture admissions per year, 152-350, and ≥ 351 admissions per year based on the distribution of the hospitals and to ensure a reasonable proportion of hospitals in each category. Data were analyzed using regression techniques while controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: Admission to high-volume units was associated with higher 30-day mortality [adjusted odds ratio (OR)=1.37 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-1.64)] and a longer length of hospital stay (adjusted relative time=1.25 (95% CI, 1.02-1.52)]. Furthermore, patients had lower odds for being mobilized within 24 hours postoperatively and for receiving basic mobility assessment and a postdischarge rehabilitation program. Time to surgery was nonsignificantly increased [adjusted relative time=1.25 (95% CI, 0.99-1.58)]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted to high-volume hip fracture units had higher mortality rates, received a lower quality of in-hospital care, and had longer length of hospital stay

Hip fracture · Medical emergency · Osteoporosis · Quality (philosophy) · Unit (ring theory) · Volume (thermodynamics) · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Emergency Medicine · Hip and Femur Fractures · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Psychology · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

  • Are Older Adults With Hip Fractures Disadvantaged in Level 1 Trauma Centers

    David Metcalfe, Olubode A Olufajo et al.•Medical Care•2016

  • What works? The association of organisational structure, reforms and interventions on efficiency in treating hip fractures

    Open Access•Unto Häkkinen, Reijo Sund•Social Science & Medicine•2021

  • Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature

    Open Access•Ethan A Halm, Clara Lee et al.•Annals of Internal Medicine•2002

  • The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology

    Open Access•Morten Schmidt, Lars Pedersen et al.•European Journal of Epidemiology•2014

  • How to measure comorbiditya critical review of available methods

    Open Access•Joseph M Kirman, V DEGROOT et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2003

  • A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies

    Open Access•Mary E Charlson, Peter Pompei et al.•Journal of Chronic Diseases•1987

  • Does Practice Make Perfect

    Ann Barry Flood, W Richard Scott et al.•Medical Care•1984

  • Hospital Volume and Patient Outcomes

    Robert G Hughes, Robert Hughes et al.•Medical Care•1988

  • Does Practice Make Perfect

    Barton H Hamilton, Vivian Ho•Medical Care•1998

  • Selecting Categories of Patients for Regionalization

    Susan C Maerki, Susan Maerki et al.•Medical Care•1986

Obras citantes distintas2
Citações por ano0,2
Intervalo de citações2016 - 2021 (6)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae