Which factors could explain the low birth weight paradox
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9260705 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Antonio Augusto Moura Da Silva (0000-0003-4968-5138, Universidade Federal do Maranhão), Heloísa Bettiol (0000-0001-8744-4373, Universidade de São Paulo), Marco A Barbieri (0000-0001-8060-1428, Universidade de São Paulo), Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito (0000-0002-7364-4718, Universidade Federal do Maranhão), Márcio Mendes Pereira (0000-0002-7900-6506, Universidade Federal do Maranhão), Vânia Maria Farias de Aragão (UFMA, Brasil), Veridiana Soares Ribeiro (0000-0003-4623-1499), Valdinar Sousa Ribeiro (UFMA, Brasil) |
| Ano | 2006 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 648-655 |
| Data de publicação | 2006-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Revista de Saúde Pública (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0034-8910 • E-ISSN: 0034-8910 |
| Editora | FapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1590/s0034-89102006000500014 |
| PMID | 17063241 |
| OpenAlex | W2164285154 |
| SCIELO_PID | S0034-89102006000500014 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 15 |
OBJECTIVE: Low birth weight children are unusual among well-off families. However, in Brazil, low birth weight rate was higher in a more developed city than in a less developed one. The study objective was to find out the reasons to explain this paradox. METHODS: A study was carried out in two municipalities, Ribeirão Preto (Southeastern Brazil) and São Luís (Northeastern Brazil), which low birth weight rates were 10.7% and 7.6% respectively. Data from two birth cohorts were analyzed: 2,839 newborns in Ribeirão Preto in 1994 and 2,439 births in São Luís in 1997-1998. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Low birth weight risk factors in São Luís were primiparity, maternal smoking and maternal age less than 18 years. In Ribeirão Preto, the associated variables were family income between one and three minimum wages, maternal age less than 18 and equal to or more than 35 years, maternal smoking and cesarean section. In a combined model including both cohorts, Ribeirão Preto presented a 45% higher risk of low birth weight than São Luís. When adjusted for maternal smoking habit, the excess risk for low birth weight in Ribeirão Preto compared to São Luís was reduced by 49%, but the confidence interval was marginally significant. Differences in cesarean section rates between both cities contributed to partially explain the paradox. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal smoking was the most important risk factor for explaining the difference in low birth weight between both cities. The other factors contributed little to explain the difference in low birth weight rates
Birth weight · Confidence interval · Confounding · Logistic regression · Low birth weight · Obstetrics · Pregnancy · Birth, Development, and Health · Demography · Gestational Diabetes Research and Management · Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare · Medicine
Secular Trend of Very Low Birth Weight Rate in Porto Alegre, Southern Brazil
Factors associated with prolonged non-nutritive sucking habits in two cohorts of Brazilian children
Secular trends in the rate of low birth weight in Brazilian State Capitals in the period 1996 to 2010
Urban social environment and low birth weight in 360 Latin American cities
Reflexões sobre o excesso de cesarianas no Brasil e a autonomia das mulheres
Is adolescent pregnancy a risk factor for low birth weight
The epidemiologic paradox of low birth weight in Brazil
Changes in perinatal health in two birth cohorts (1997/1998 and 2010) in São Luís, Maranhão State, Brazil
The challenge of reducing neonatal mortality in middle-income countries
On the importance—and the unimportance— of birthweight
High birthweights among infants of north African immigrants in Belgium
Fatores associados à inadequação do uso da assistência pré-natal
Infant mortality and low birth weight in cities of Northeastern and Southeastern Brazil
Saúde perinatal
Common vampire bat attacks on humans in a village of the Amazon region of Brazil
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2010 - 2021 (12) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |