Carmen 65 and the Arrangement of Catullus' Poetry
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 9307590 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Elizabeth Block (California University of Pennsylvania, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1984 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 48-59 |
| Data de publicação | 1984-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Ramus (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0048-671X • E-ISSN: 2202-932X |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0048671x00005117 |
| OpenAlex | W2482199101 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 20 |
| Referências citadas | 24 |
While the metrical arrangement of the Catullan corpus has seemed to many scholars too artificial and inartistic to have been the poet's own choice, this opinion is now being challenged, in part because recent studies have shown that the collections could have been included in one roll, or Liber , and thus may be read as a single structure. Critics increasingly have sought the principles of organization in thematic correspondences or in the formation of ‘cycles’ within the three metrical groupings. Current studies have focused on the resonances in and among the groups, and on the function (and identification) of the first and last poems of each section and of the corpus as a whole. Several scholars have suggested (although without unanimity in specifics, and for different reasons) that the three sections consist of poems 1-51, 61-64, and 65-116. Others (see Most, n. 3 below) argue that the long poems are arranged as a group, so that the corpus consists of the polymetrics, the long poems (61-68), and the short elegiacs (69-116). Any attempt to explain the arrangement of Catullus' poetry must address this controversy. One way to approach the problem is to examine c. 65, the first poem in elegiac meter. While some studies note that c. 65 hints at a ‘new poetic consciousness in Catullus’ this richly textured piece is still dismissed as ‘merely a covering letter.’ The following discussion seeks to discover whether c. 65 does simply accompany c. 66, or whether, reflecting the themes and motifs of the preceding poetry, it implies an alteration in the poet's sensibility
Art · Consciousness · Elegiac · Epistemology · Literature · Poetry · Section (typography · Tone (literature · Unanimity · Classical Antiquity Studies · Computer Science · Historical and Literary Studies · History · Law · Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods · Philosophy
Loves and elegy
Tibullus in first place
Militia amoris
The puella
Caius Cornelius Gallus
The poeta-amator, nequitia and recusatio
Translation and imitation of classical elegy in the French eighteenth century
Russian elegists and Latin lovers in the long eighteenth century
Greek elegy
Ovid the love elegist
Latin love elegy and other genres
Time, place and political background
Breaking the rules
Propertius
Latin love elegy in Late Antiquity
Latin precursors
‘The woman’
The Latin elegiac couplet
The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy
Most musicall, most melancholy’
Catullus
Catulli Veronensis Liber
Tradition and originality in Roman poetry.
Aufstieg Und Niedergang Der Romischen Welt
Catullus
On Some Unnecessarily Indecent Interpretations of Catullus 2 and 3
A Commentary on Catullus
Zu Catull C. 2 a Und Der Trennung Der Gedichte in Den Handschriften
Callimachus and Catullus
Approaches to Catullus
Catullus 63 and the Theme of Marriage
On the Arrangement of Catullus’ Carmina Maiora
Catullus 116
Metrical Variations and Some Textual Problems in Catullus
About Form and Feeling in Catullus 65
Poetics of Opening and Closure in Meleager, Catullus, and Gallus
Style and Tradition in Catullus
| Obras citantes distintas | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,54 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2013 - 2019 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 20 |