State Constitutional Law in 1935–36

There is a kernel of truth in Chief Justice Hughes' remark that “we are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is.” To realize its full significance, “constitution” must be written in the plural. We have forty-nine courts of last resort, each interpreting the fundamental law of its own jurisdiction. The essential similarity of our state constitutions, and of our state bills of rights to that of the national constitution, together with the tendency of common law courts to follow each other's decisions, lend an element of stability to American state constitutional law that otherwise would be lacking. At the same time, even within so short a period as a year, the interplay of personalities may be seen moulding new doctrines in particular jurisdictions, which doctrines take on added significance because of the realization that they may, in time, serve as a basis for redirecting the course of constitutional development in other jurisdictions as well

Constitution · Constitutional law · Economic Justice · Element (criminal law · Jurisdiction · Plural · Political science · State (computer science · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Philosophy

• Analyzing Constitutions

  Peter M Shane•The Oxford Handbook of Political…•2009

  Incluir item

• The Bill of Rights and Criminal Law Enforcement

  Open Access•J A C Grant•The Annals of the American…•1934

  Incluir item