Recognition of Governments should not be Abolished

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9557670
AutoresM J Peterson (Harvard University, autor correspondente)
Ano1983
Volume77
Fascículo1
Páginas31-50
Data de publicação1983-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAmerican Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2201197
OpenAlexW2047171795
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas8
Referências citadas9

Recognition of governments serves three functions in the international legal system: ensuring that only regimes clearly deserving such status are accepted as governments of states, assuring new governments that others will respect their status, and informing courts, government agencies, and nationals of recognizing states that a particular regime is in fact the government of another state. Lately, some statesmen and a respectable number of legal scholars have come to view recognition of governments as causing more difficulties than it is worth as it is now used. In particular, they suspect that decisions whether to recognize a new regime often depend more on its character or policy than on its ability to meet the objective test of effectively ruling its state, and they believe that current doctrine on the effects of recognition or nonrecognition creates unnecessary confusion

Business · Confusion · Doctrine · Economics · Government (linguistics · Law and economics · Political science · Social recognition · State (computer science · Suspect · Test (biology · Computer Science · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

Ferramentas

Abrir DOISci-Hub