Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The Boundary Dispute Between Peru and Ecuador

Dados Bibliográficos

ID9560197
AutoresRonald Bruce St John (autor correspondente)
Ano1977
Volume71
Fascículo2
Páginas322-330
Data de publicação1977-04-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAmerican Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0002-9300 • E-ISSN: 2161-7953
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0002930000110851
OpenAlexW2947528458
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas7

In an article in this Journal some years ago, Professor Georg Maier analyzed the legal cases presented by the Republics of Peru and Ecuador during their long boundary dispute and concluded that the Ecuadorian Government had a much stronger de jure title to the disputed territory, while the Peruvian Government’s claim rested primarily on a strong de facto title. Consequently, he argued that the 1942 Rio Protocol which awarded the Peruvian Government the bulk of the territories in question was not an equitable solution to the dispute since such a solution would lie between the extremes of Ecuador’s de jure case and Peru’s de facto case. He further concluded that a more equitable solution should be sought so the dispute would no longer be an impediment to amicable relations between the two countries. The conclusion of this writer is that the Peruvian Government’s de jure case in the dispute was stronger than that of the Ecuadorian Government and that Peru’s legal case was then buttressed by a prolonged occupation and development of much of the disputed area. Furthermore, even if the Rio Protocol was not an equitable solution to the problem, no legal justification exists for demanding the renegotiation of a pact signed and ratified by both the Peruvian and Ecuadorian Governments and then guaranteed by four other American Governments

Boundary (topology · De facto · Government (linguistics · Political science · Politics · Territorial dispute · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · International Relations in Latin America · Law · Philosophy

  • The Saavedra Lamas Peace

    Open Access•Luis Schenoni, Gary Goertz et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2024

  • The United States and Inter-American Security, 1889-1960

    James L Busey, J Lloyd Mecham•The Western Political Quarterly•1962

  • The Boundary Dispute between Ecuador and Peru

    Open Access•Georg Maier•American Journal of International…•1969

  • The Ecuador-Peru Boundary Controversy

    Open Access•L H Woolsey•American Journal of International…•1937

  • A Study of the Conflict between the Republics of Peru and Ecuador

    Laura Wright, L A Wright•Geographical Journal•1941

  • Zarumilla-Marañón

    Frank Macd Spindler, David H Zook•Hispanic American Historical Review•1965

  • The Controversy between Peru and Ecuador

    Robert E Mcnicoll•Hispanic American Historical Review•1942

  • The United States and Latin American Wars, 1932-1942

    Walter V Scholes, Bryce Wood•Hispanic American Historical Review•1967

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano0,5
Intervalo de citações2024 - 2024 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae